Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

Eclipse!

On October 14, 2023 the moon eclipsed the sun. An annular eclipse, I had never before seen. I wanted to see it!

My dog and I took a road trip that morning to Indian Point Pier just north of Corpus Christi, Texas. It was a little under 3 hours away from home.

If you ever have the chance to see an eclipse of the sun, make sure that you have especially dark “eclipse” glasses to view the sun. Otherwise it could permanently damage your eyes! NEVER look at the sun!

The photo above was snapped on a cell phone through one lens of my “eclipse” glasses. It shows the annular “Ring of Fire” around the edges of the moon’s shadow. Talk about the dark side of the moon! I was impressed by how much energy from the Sun still reached the Earth from that tiny ring. It was still more or less daylight under the penumbra of the shadow of the moon! You could never tell that the sunlight was so dampened by the full diameter of the moon, except for the penlight effect on shadows through the leaves of trees. Thousands of images of the eclipsed sun danced in the dappled shadows of tall tree leaves for about five minutes just before noon Central Time.

If I am free next April, I hope to experience the darkness of “totality” during another solar eclipse. One will become visible along a path through Texas next spring. Stay tuned!

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

We have a number of gun problems

Just so we’re clear

 

During the year of most of a million pandemic deaths, 2020,

 

https://usafacts.org/articles/preliminary-us-death-statistics-more-deaths-in-2020-than-2019-coronavirus-age-flu/

 

FBI statistics reported 17,813 homicides, a big increase from the 12k to 15k range of the past decade:

 

Shooting     13,663     77%

Knifing, cutting     1,739     10%

Weapon not stated     983     6%

Fists/feet/strangulation 733     4%

Clubbing, hammering     393     2%

Drugging, poisoning      129     1%

Burning, drowning,

exploding, any other     115     1%

 

Of the 13,663 murders known to be committed with a gun, homicides included 8,029 by handgun, 4,863 by firearm of unspecified type, 455 by rifle, 203 by shotgun, and 113 by “other” guns

 

https://crime-data-explorer.app.cloud.gov/pages/explorer/crime/shr

 

Firearms also caused 24,292 of the 45,979 deaths by suicide in 2020 (53%)

 

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm

 

Mass

Slaughter

By

Assault

Rifle

Represents

Only

One

Significant

US gun problem.

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

All about Suckow (and “The Suckow Oak”)


Photo: The Suckow Oak by Joachim Müllerchen

Andreas Michael
Werner

MORE ABOUT THIS AUTHOR

MORE POSTS BY THIS AUTHOR

The Suckow oak is one of the oldest trees on the island of Usedom. Only a few minutes by car north of the town of Usedom of the same name is the village of Suckow. Arrived in the idyllic village it is only a few hundred meters to the north on the main road.

The oak tree, which is over 20 m high, can already be seen from a great distance. Its crown is over 30 m wide and the trunk of the tree also has a circumference of more than 20 m. So it would take more than eleven average-sized people for a human chain, holding hands, to form around the tree.

The age of the oak is estimated between 750 and 1000 years. Because already at the end of the 13th century it was mentioned in documents by the Duke of Pomerania, Bogislaw IV, as the border of Usedom. It is known that the oak is located on a more than 3000-year-old mound grave.

The natural monument is very popular with residents, travelers and tourists of the village of Suckow. Many use this place to briefly escape from everyday life, to let their thoughts wander and to open up to a new sense of time.

Source: Meck-Pomm-Lese | Die Suckower Eiche (https://www.meck-pomm-lese.de/sehenswuerdigkeiten/oertlichkeiten/die-suckower-eiche/)

East German Tree Archive

Home / Content / Oak on the burial mound near Suckow on Usedom, circumference 6.95 m

Oak on the burial mound near Suckow on Usedom, circumference 6.95 m View in lightbox 

 


Oak on the burial mound near Suckow village on Usedom Island, circumference 6.95 m

This impressive stalk oak has many names: “Suckow oak”, “pedestal oak” or “giant oak”, which testifies to its famousness. Already in 1298 it is said to have served as a landmark for a demarcation and therefore it should be over 700 years old, which of course is nonsense. If there were to be such detailed traditions from this time, then it was certainly the “burial mound” (a megalithic tomb?) or predecessor trees that were usable landmarks. The age of 400 mentioned in FRÖHLICH (1994) is probably exaggerated and represents the highest limit for an age estimate.
On our first visit in 2002, a strong crown trunk had already broken out (July 1997), on our second and unfortunately so far last visit in 2009 we noted another astausbruch on the north side of the large and wide crown. In the meantime, access to the oak has been “blocked” due to “acute risk of breakage”, the oak is heavily affected by brown rot. We also recorded a circumference of 6.95 m, but there are considerably larger volumes circulating in the net, possibly due to the strongly waisted shape of the trunk and the partial crown eruption. So we have to go back as soon as possible, measure and accept the danger. Location: Suckow.

District: Ostvorpommern.
Location: 400 m northwest of the village on the road to Krienke.
Natural monument: Yes.
Tree species: Stalk oak, Quercus robur.
Circumference 2009: 
695 cm. Photo from 2009.
For a photo from the year 2002 see here in the album “Fröhlich – Wege zu alten Bäumen – Mecklenburg-Vorpommern”.

Sources: FRÖHLICH, H.J. (1994): Wege zu alten Bäumen, Band 9 Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, WDV Wirtschaftsdienst, Frankfurt a.M. GPS coordinates: 53.915501, 13.954980.

Source: https://www.ostdeutschesbaumarchiv.de/content/eiche-suckow/

Suckow in the Lieper Winkel

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

 

Characteristics of the local chronicle

Place 

Rankwitz

Temporal focus 

consecutive 

Copyrights 

 

Creation period 

since 2019 

Publication Date 

published 

Content categorization 

History of the municipality of Rankwitz

Status (traffic light system) 

in continuous processing 

 

 


Table of contents

  • Suckow

    is a village and a former municipality in the municipality of Rankwitz on the island of Usedom in the Lieper Winkel. Suckow belongs to the parish of Morgenitz.

    Vorpommern-Greifswald district, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany. It is administered by the Amt Usedom-Süd with its seat in the city of Usedom.

    by Ulrich Baenz, chronicler from Zinnowitz


     
     


     
     


    Suckow in the late Middle Ages (around 1200 to 1517)

    Suckow (Szuinarivitz – pig herding) 1270 First mention,the canons of Cammin give the bishop’s tithes of Suckow to the monastery Grobe and receive the village Damerow near Naugard.

    1298 Establishment of the boundaries between Suckow and Usedom.

    Reformation and Post-Reformation Period (1517 to 1648)

    1527 Enfeoffment of Georg Jürgen von Borcke, Princely Councillor and Captain of Treptow a.T., by the dukes Georg and Barnim. Due to the extinction of the Lepel family, the estates of Crienke, Suckow, Carnin and Regezow passed to the dukes.

    Until the Napoleonic period (until 1813)

    Under Sweden’s rule (1648 – 1720)


    1693 Suckow

    1693 Sukkow is a service village, living in it: 1.Michel Smett, Schulze, 2. Hans Lüder, 3. Marten Smett, 4. Petter Radz, 5. Jacob Smett – These farmers all have to farm the same. In ancient times, 7 farmers and one Kossat lived here, and so now 2 farmers and a Kossatenstelle are deserted here, which the owner of this field and these meadows has been cultivating himself for a long time now.

    Until the unification of the Reich (until 1871)

    under Prussia (from 1720)

    1779 a farming village belonging to the Good Crienke, 1/2 mile from Uesedom to the north, on the Peene and on the Crienker heide, has 5 farmers, 1 Coßäthen, 13 fireplaces, fishing in the Peene, is parished at Morgenitz in the Uesedom Synod, and is an old Borksches Lehn, which is the captain and cathedral provost of Colberg, erderman Curt von Bork, owns. (See Altwigshagen among the noble estates of the Anklam circle)

    1800 Suckow has 12 acres 22 Ruthen after the controllable attack 5 Landhufen and is a farming village belonging to the Good Crienke and an old fief of the von Borck, which the descendants of captain Erdmann Curt von Borck own.

    1858 a farming village, 4 farms and 4 Kossäthenhöfe together with 3 Büdnern and 1 school, belongs to the Dominio Crienke, located on the Crienker Haide and parished to Morgenitz. The village has 17 houses and 103 inhabitants.

    Empire (1871-1918)

    1896 to 1898 Road construction from Liepe via Suckow to Usedom

    Weimar Republic (1918-1933)

    Third Reich (1933-1945)

    SBZ and GDR (1945-1990)

    the present time

    Suckow in the newspaper 1996 – 2014


    1996 Oak U. Baenz

     
     


    1996 Oak expert opinion

     
     


    1996

     
     


    1997 Part 1

     
     


    1997 Part 2

     
     


    1997 Oak broken

     
     


    1997

     
     


    1997

     
     


    1999

     
     


    2002 Amt Usedom Süd 10

     
     


    2002 Office 10 years

     
     


    2005 Oak fuse

     
     


    2010 Teil 1

     
     


    2010 Teil 2

     
     


    2010 Teil 3

     
     


    2010 Teil 4

     
     


    2013 Teil 1

     
     


    2013 Teil 2

     
     


    2013 Teil 3

     
     


    2013 Teil 4

     
     


    2013 Teil 5

     
     


    2014 Bild Zeitung

     
     


    2014 Eiche Gefahr

    Bildergalerien

    Tafeln zur Geschichte des Heimatvereins


    Suckow History

     
     


    Suckow History Part 1

     
     


    Suckow History Part 2

     
     


    Suckow History Part 3

     
     


    Suckow History Panel 2019

    Natural monument Suckow oak


    Oak February 1997 with iron ring

     
     


    Text even before the cancellation came

     
     


    Oak 2013

     
     


    Oak 2013- Imprint of the rings still visible

     
     


    Suckow Oak Natural Monument

     
     


    Oak in 2019 – it greens!

     
     


    Suckower oak the dry branch

     
     


    Historical explanations of oak

    Suckow in 2019


    House must protect itself from modern traffic

     
     


    Large brick barn

     
     


    Old street trees bear witness to history

     
     


    Advertising for the Lieper Winkel

    Further information about Suckow

    Contacts

    Collections of postcards, brochures and newspaper clippings: inspection by Hilde Stockmann rohrspatz@gmx.com

    Source: Suckow im Lieper Winkel – Local Chronicles (ortschroniken-mv.de) (https://www.ortschroniken-mv.de/index.php/Suckow_im_Lieper_Winkel)

    Suckow (Rankwitz)

    Jump to navigationJ ump to search

    Suckow is a district of the municipality of Rankwitz,about 3 km south of the geographical border to the Lieper Winkel on the island of Usedom.


    Table of contents

    • History[edit | Edit Source]

      North of Suckow, a neolithic megalithic tomb (5500 to 1800 vdZ) was suspected, but later investigations (1971) contradicted this and classified the complex as a burial mound grave of the Bronze Age (1800 to 600 vdZ). It is about 8 × 8 m tall and 1 m high. It is on a hill overgrown with an old oak tree. The place is also called “Suckower Oak”. It proves an early settlement of the area. A tower hill is preserved near Suckow as evidence of early German settlement (from 1230). Tower hill castles were built for the locators, as a forerunner of the manor houses. Finds of fieldstone foundation remains and brick debris show the design. At a distance of 25 m, a ring trench semicircle circles as the rest of the plant.

      Suckow had its first documentary mention as “Szuinariuitz” in 1270. The Slavic name is interpreted as “pig herding”. [1] In the document of 15 March of that year, the Bishop of Cammin, in whose possession the village was located, exchanged it at the request of Duke Barnim I of Pomerania-Szczecin together with five other communities on Usedom (Ückeritz, Balm am Balmer SeeLoddinMellenthin and Krienke) for Damerow in Hinterpommern (near Naugard), which was part of the Premonstratensianmonastery Grobe Usedom (city); In 1309 it moved to Pudagla.

      The majority of the Lieper Winkel had already come to Grobe Abbey two generations earlier under the widow of Barnim’s grandfather Bogislaw I.

      In 1527 Suckow, together with Morgenitz, became the property of the noble von Borcke family with a manor in Krienke (there are also the spellings of Borcken and von Borck).

      Almost the entire island of Usedom was owned by the monastery Grobe/Pudagla, according to the property map of 1530. Only the estates of Mellenthin and Gothen belonged to the von Neuenkirchen (Nigenkerken) family, Krienke and Suckow as well as Regezow to the von Borcke family, Stolpe to the Schwerinen and the Gnitz to the von Lepel family. All other lands belonged to the church or monasteries until 1535. After the Reformation, these possessions became dominal (state or royal property), except for the lands assigned to the local churches.

      In the following, only a few regional records can be found. The area shares the history of the island of Usedom under the Pomeraniandukes and later as part of Swedish Pomerania. The area belonged to the part of Pomerania that came to Prussia with the Treaty of Stockholm in 1720.

      Around 1880, Suckow was a dead-end village and a rural character.

      Between 1896 and 1898, the only art street (cobbled street) was built through the Lieper Winkel, which still exists today as an avenue and connects Suckow. Previously, Suckow, like all other villages on the peninsula, was only accessible by land.

      In GDR times, the village expanded, but this had to do with the land reform and the creation of the new farmsteads. On 1 July 1950, Suckow was incorporated into Krienke.

      The place, which consists of only a few streets with a few thatchedhouses, has not yet found a connection to organized tourism. During the main holiday season, however, interested visitors and cyclists come by.

      Places of interest[edit | Edit Source]

      • Tower Hill Suckow

      Suckower Oak[edit | Edit Source]


      Pedestal oak near Suckow (condition September 2006)


      Natural monument Suckow oak in the NP island of Usedom 7 May 2017 Sprouting


      Table in front of the Suckow oak

      The at least 700-year-old pedestal oak about 1 km north of the village on the main road through the Lieper Winkel was already mentioned by Bogislaw IV of Pomerania-Szczecin in 1298 in a document on the border of the district of Usedom.

      The more than 20 m high tree with a 30 m wide crown and a trunk circumference of 6.50 m stands on one of the megalithic tombs near Suckow.

      She may have grown up in the freistand; the surrounding forests had already been cleared of fire at the time of Bogislaw I. According to other theories, it could be much older (up to 1000 years are estimated) and in this case belonged to a forest area where the Slavs – according to the name of the village – herded their pigs.

      According to a local information board, three tree mushrooms (Spechtloch-SchillerporlingSchwefelporling and Eichen-Feuerschwamm) are responsible for the fact that on July 2, 1997 a star branch broke and the trunk and branches became so porous that there is a risk of falling over for the whole tree. Tourists are asked not to approach the tree closer than 10 m. In the meantime, a second main branch has broken off and there is still a high risk of breakage.

      Suckower firs

      Together with the Mellenthiner Heide and the city forest of Usedom (city), the Suckow fir trees form a closed forest area. It is frequented by hikers and cyclists who are looking for exercise away from the holiday centers. Roads and restaurants do not (yet) exist in 2005; the highest elevation is the Kirchenberg (50 m).

      References

  1. ^ Manfred Niemeyer: Ostvorpommern I. Collection of sources and literature on the place names. Vol. 1: Usedom. (= Greifswalder Beiträge zur Ortsnamenkunde. Bd. 1), Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Institut für Slawistik, Greifswald 2001, ISBN 3-86006-149-6. p. 58

External links


Wikimedia Commons has media related to : Suckower Oak

Coordinates: 53° 55′ N, 13° 58′ E  |

Categories

Source: Suckow (Rankwitz) – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suckow_(Rankwitz))

The name Suckow comes from Szuinaruitz pig herding. First documentary mention of Suckow occurred in 1270. In the past, there were oak forests in the area where pigs fattened. However, the place must have been settled much earlier, because a burial mound from the Bronze Age was found under the giant oak. There are still many houses covered with reeds in the village today. The place is a district of Rankwitz in the Lieper Winkel. To this day, there are no large holiday resorts in the village. Private holiday rooms and holiday apartments are rented. In Suckow there is a natural monument, the Suckow Oak. The very old tree stands on a mound grave. In the surroundings of the village are the Suckow firs, a forest area ideal for walks in nature without car exhaust. If you want to go on holiday in Suckow, it is best to travel by car and bicycles. A public bus from Rchtung city of Usedom runs relatively rarely and if you want to swim on the Baltic Sea coast, it takes a relatively long time to get there.

Suckow in the Lieper Winkel thatch covered houses. Also in this village beautiful private apartments are rented. Near Suckow there is a castle hotel, which has been restored by the current owners of the hotel. If you are interested in old churches, you should visit the church Liepe or the church Mellenthin. Larger shopping facilities exist in the shopping city of Usedom. According to my information, there is still no restaurant in Suckow. You can eat in the restaurant Bauernstube in the neighbouring village of Morgenitz.

View of the village of Suckow on Usedom. Around 70 inhabitants live in the old farming village. Many residents have a small garden for self-sufficiency at home.

Suckow in the Usedom hinterland.

View of Suckow in the village center.

The holiday village of Suckow on the island of Usedom.

Meadows and fields surround Suckow.

Source: Suckow – Island Usedom – Lieper Winkel – Holiday Info (mv-ostsee.de) (https://www.mv-ostsee.de/insel-usedom/suckow/infos.html)

From the Renaissance castle to the oldest oak trees in Usedom

JULY 29, 2020 POSTED IN BLOG POSTS

Wooded nature reserves and many ancient trees with thick trunks and gnarled branches can be discovered on Usedom. A tour leads to the two oldest.

Renaissance of forests

Forests are currently experiencing a renaissance not only in Germany. Some are designated as “climate forests” or “healing forests”, others invite you to guided “forest bathing”, including a warm hug of old trees. Whether this trend is not also specifically promoted by clever marketing, ultimately everyone has to decide for themselves. The fact is, however, that every intact forest makes a valuable contribution not only to the climate, but also to human health. You don’t have to be a biologist to experience first-hand how holistically healthy and invigorating a walk in the forest can be for body and mind. These very special forest experiences are also reasons why we are drawn to the Baltic Sea island of Usedom on holiday.

In the footsteps of old trees

Come again please, forests on Usedom? Isn’t the second largest German island much more known for sun, beach and unadulterated bathing fun? That may be true. Without question, the 42-kilometre-long, fine sandy beach is not only the longest in Germany and one of the most beautiful. In addition, the sun shines here more often than anywhere else in Germany. But with 14 nature reserves, the sunny island of Usedom also has the highest density of protected areas in Germany. Many of them are even forests, such as the coastal forest on the Streckelsberg near Koserow. Others are quite wooded, such as the Mümmelkensee, the Zerninsee or the old forest on the Mellenthiner Os.

The idyllic Usedom hinterland (“Usedomer Achterland”) particularly impresses active holidaymakers, enthusiastic hikers and cyclists. Here, right in the heart of the island, is the moated castle Mellenthin, one of the most beautiful feel-good hotels in Usedom. The venerable Renaissance castle from the 16th century now houses a wellness hotel with its own brewery, distillery and coffee roastery. Surrounded by a 20-metre-wide moat, embedded in a wooded and historic cultural landscape, the most beautiful tours over the entire island start from the moated castle Mellenthin.


One tour leads to the oldest trees in Usedom.

The Suckow oak – oldest tree on Usedom

The oldest tree on Usedom is an oak tree. The Suckow oak was already on record in a 1298 CE ducal document. For more than 700 years, it has defied every storm. But slowly the old giant is weakening. A large main branch has already broken off. Although protected as a natural monument since 1936, brown rot cannot be stopped in the imposing oak, The fungal disease decomposes the 20-meter-high and equally wide giant from the inside out. However, this very weakness brings the beloved ancient tree closer to the people again.

But there are other historical trees to marvel at on the way to the Suckow oak. One is located in Mellenthin, just a few hundred meters from the moated castle. In the courtyard of the village church there is also a great oak tree, which is also about 700 years old. It nestles against the old stone wall in the cemetery.

The old tree now rises over 22 meters into the sky. Its trunk circumference of more than seven meters is enormous. And yes you can also hug them if you want to.

Ancient oak in the courtyard of the village church Mellenthin

Source: Wasserschloss Hotel Insel Usedom // From Renaissance castle to the oldest oak trees in Usedom [286] | Blog Posts // Schloss Erlebnis Gastronomie (wasserschloss-mellenthin.de) (https://www.wasserschloss-mellenthin.de/blogbeitrage/vom-renaissanceschloss-zu-den-altesten-eichen-usedoms-286.html)

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

History of Germany

Paleolithic to Neolithic Period

History of Germany between 43000 BCE – 2301 BCE

Ice-age Paleolithic


Venus of
Hohle Fels

The ancient humans were present in Germany at least 600,000 years ago. The oldest complete hunting weapons ever found anywhere in the world were discovered in a coal mine in Schoningen, Germany in 1995 where three 380,000 year old wooden javelins unearthed. The Neander valley in Germany was the location where the first ever non-modern human fossil was discovered and recognized in 1856; the new species of human was named Neanderthal man. The Neanderthal 1 fossils are 40,000 years old. At a similar age, evidence of modern humans exists in caves in the Swabian Jura near Ulm. Finds include 42,000 year old bird bone and mammoth ivory flutes which are the oldest musical instruments ever found, the 40,000 year old Ice Age Löwenmensch figurine which is the oldest uncontested figurative art discovered, and the 35,000 year old Venus of Hohle Fels which is the oldest uncontested human figurative art discovered.

Mesolithic Period

The Mesolithic began with the Holocene warm period around 10,000 BCE and ended with the introduction of farming, the date of which varied in each geographical region. Regions that experienced greater environmental effects as the last glacial period ended have a much more apparent Mesolithic era, lasting millennia. In northern Europe, for example, societies were able to live well on rich food supplies from the marshlands created by the warmer climate. Such conditions produced distinctive human behaviors that are preserved in the material record, such as the Maglemosian and Azilian cultures. Most of the Mesolithic findings in Germany are located in the south-western regions like Upper Rhine Valley, Black Forest and Swabian Jura.

Neolithic Period

The term Neolithic or New Stone Age is most frequently used in connection with agriculture, which is the time when cereal cultivation and animal domestication was introduced. Because agriculture developed at different times in different regions of the world, there is no single date for the beginning of the Neolithic. The agriculture first developed in Central Europe about 5,500 BCE.

In Germany one of the most important Neolithic sites is the Goseck circle, dating to approximately the 5th millennium BCE, discovered by aerial photographs from the 1990s and, since 2003, regarded as the oldest observatory in Europe. It consists of a circular Henge-construction with a diameter of 75 m. It marks the beginning of a millennia-old astronomical tradition known also from the Nebra skydisk, discovered in 1999, only 25 km distant therefrom.

References: Ancient.euMuseo Tridentino di Scienze Naturali

 

Bronze Age

History of Germany between 2300 BCE – 801 BCE

The German Bronze Age is usually divided into an Early Bronze Age (from the end of the third/beginning of the second millennium BCE to around 1600 BCE), a Middle Bronze Age (1600–c.1300 BCE), and a Late Bronze Age, also called the Urnfield period (1300–c.800 BCE). The most important distinguishing features are the burial customs and grave forms: the Early Bronze Age was characterized by flat graves with bodies buried in the crouched position, the Middle Bronze Age by inhumations beneath mounds, and the Late Bronze Age by the deposition of urns containing cremated remains in burial places known as urn fields.

In Central Europe, the early Bronze Age Unetice culture (1800-1600 BCE) includes numerous smaller groups like the Straubingen, Adlerberg and Hatvan cultures. Some very rich burials, such as the one located at Leubingen (today part of Sömmerda) with grave gifts crafted from gold, point to an increase of social stratification already present in the Unetice culture. Cemeteries of this period are rare and of small size. Following the Unetice culture the middle Bronze Age Tumulus culture was characterized by inhumation burials in tumuli (barrows).

Cremation burials characterized the late Bronze Age Urnfield culture. It includes the Lusatian culture in eastern Germany and Poland (1300-500 BCE) that continued into the Iron Age. The Central European Bronze Age led to the Iron Age Hallstatt culture (700-450 BCE).

References: WikipediaOxford Handbooks Online

 

Iron Age

History of Germany between 800 BCE – 251 BCE

In Europe, the Iron Age included the last stages of the prehistoric period and the first of the proto-historic periods. The Iron Age in Europe produced an elaboration of designs in weapons, implements, and utensils. These were no longer cast but hammered into shape, and decoration was elaborate curvilinear rather than simple rectilinear; the forms and character of the ornamentation of the northern European weapons resembled in some respects Roman arms, while in other respects they were peculiar and evidently representative of northern art. Iron Age people buried their dead in an extended position, whereas in the preceding late Bronze Age cremated remains in urns had been the rule.

A great cemetery, discovered in 1846, of Hallstatt, near Gmunden, represents the transition from bronze to iron in Central Europe with forms of late Bronze Age implements and weapons imitated in iron for burials. In the Swiss or La Tène group of implements and weapons, forms are new and the transition complete. In Central Europe, the Iron Age generally divided into the early Iron Age Hallstatt culture (800–450 BCE) and the late Iron Age La Tène culture (beginning in 450 BCE).

The Celtic culture, or rather Proto-Celtic groups, had expanded to much of Central Europe (Gauls), and, following the Gallic invasion of the Balkans in 279 BCE, as far east as central Anatolia (Galatians). In Central Europe, the prehistoric Iron Age ends with the Roman conquest.

From the Hallstatt culture, the Iron Age spread westward with Celtic expansion from the 6th century BCE. In Poland, the Iron Age reached the late Lusatian culture about the 6th century, followed in some areas by the Pomeranian culture.

The ethnic ascription of many Iron Age cultures is bitterly contested, as the roots of Germanic, Baltic and Slavic peoples converged in this area.

 

Germanic Tribes

History of Germany between 250 BCE – 486 CE

The Germanic tribes originated in Scandinavia, from which they moved south around 1000 BCE. By 100 BCE they had reached the Rhine area, and about two hundred years later, the Danube Basin, both Roman borders. The western German tribes consisted of the Marcomanni, Alamanni, Franks, Angles, and Saxons, while the Eastern tribes north of the Danube consisted of the Vandals, Gepids, Ostrogoths, and Visigoths. The Alans, Burgundians, and Lombards are less easy to define.

In approximately 222 BCE, the first use of the Latin term “Germani” appears in the Roman inscription which may simply be referring to Gaul or related people. Caesar first observed the Germanic tribes in 51 BCE, and marked them as a possible threat. German tribes were clan-based, with blood-loyalty the basis for all bonds. Living intermittently in settled forest clearings called hamlets, they engaged in mixed subsistence cultivation of crops and animals. Cultivation was rudimentary given the hard clay soil and use of implements more suited to Mediterranean areas. There were no food surpluses, so population remained small, around one million. Without occupational specialization, they were an iron-age culture that emphasized warfare.

The Roman historian Tacitus described the Germans again about 100 CE. After The Roman Caesar had conquered Gaul up to the Rhine, expansion space was curtailed for the nomadic tribes, causing demographic pressure on the borders. Some Germans began to come into contact with Roman civilization at border garrisons. They greatly admired the material aspects of Roman culture, such as arms, domestic wares, etc. Roman legions accepted small numbers for auxiliary service, and small scale German-Roman trade relations emerged involving cattle and slaves.

Germans on the move


Porta Nigra in Trier, best preserved
Roman building north of the Alps.

Gradually, changes occurred in the tribes over the first centuries CE: Though kinship remained the primary bond, a new kind of political formation evolved as the Comitatus. Older, successful warrior chieftains took in younger aspirants, who then raided and shared the booty with each other. This arrangement produced a professional, more lethal warrior group, where bonds were now between man and lord, the latter signaling the beginning of a small aristocracy. At the same time inter-tribal conflict increased, spurred in part by the desire to partake of Roman material culture. Tribes began electing fewer, longer serving war-chiefs. Eastern German tribes, Goths and Vandals, also gradually migrated from North Poland to the Ukraine, pressuring the Danube frontier; they also settled north of the Black Sea, to the West of the Huns.

Around 200, small tribes began to coalesce into supra-tribal groups. Southern Germans came together into the Alamanni, while middle Rhine groups incorporated into the Franks, and the North Germans coalesced as Saxons. By the 300s, there was a continual belt of barbarian tribes all along the Roman lines from the North Sea to the Black Sea.

Increasing numbers of Germans began to serve as Roman auxiliary forces just beyond the Roman borders, learning new tactics, acquiring better materials, coming to admire Roman society even more. Some even underwent a process of partial Romanization. A son of a captured slave, Ulfillias, gradually converted some, the Visigoths in particular, to Christianity from the 340s. While the Roman church soon branded Arian forms of Christianity as heresy, Visigoths slowly communicated it to the Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Burgundians.

By the early 4th century, the reign of Constantine achieved an element of stability to the benefit both of the Romans and of their more primitive neighbors. This was about to be upset, from about 370 CE, by devastating Hun incursions from the east.

The arrival of the Huns


The Huns, whose name has come to rival the Vandals as an emotive term for destructive violence, arrive in history with an impact as sudden as it is mysterious. They appear from the steppes north of the Black Sea in the late 4th century. About 370 the Huns defeated the Ostrogoths. Six years later they descended upon the Visigoths, driving them south over the Danube. For a while, Huns bode their time in the territories of the Ostrogoths and Visigoths. But they had already set in motion a chain reaction now called the Migration Period. The period of human migration, roughly between 300 and 700 CE, in Europe marked the transition from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. These movements were catalyzed by profound changes within both the Roman Empire and the so-called ‘barbarian frontier’. Migrating peoples during this period included the Huns, Goths, Vandals, Bulgars, Alans, Suebi, Frisians, and Franks, among other Germanic and Slavic tribes.

The first phase, between 300 and 500 CE, put Germanic peoples in control of most areas of the former Western Roman Empire. The first to formally enter Roman territory — as refugees from the Huns — were the Visigoths in 376. Tolerated by the Romans on condition that they defend the Danube frontier, they rebelled, eventually invading Italy and sacking Rome itself in 410 CE, before settling in Iberia and founding a kingdom there that endured 300 years. They were followed into Roman territory by the Ostrogoths led by Theodoric the Great, who settled in Italy itself. In Gaul, the Franks, a fusion of western Germanic tribes whose leaders had strongly aligned with Rome, entered Roman lands more gradually and peacefully during the 5th century, and generally found acceptance as rulers of the Roman-Gaulish population. Fending off challenges from the Allemanni, Burgundians and Visigoths, the Frankish kingdom became the nucleus of the future states of France and Germany. Meanwhile, Roman Britain was more slowly invaded and settled by Angles and Saxons.

References: Wikipediaancient.euhistoryworld.net

 

Part of the Frankish Empire

History of Germany between 487 – 843 CE

Merovingian kingdom (481-751)

Numerous small Frankish kingdoms existed during the 5th century around Cologne, Tournai, Le Mans, Cambrai and elsewhere. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Franks created an empire under the Merovingian kings and subjugated the other Germanic tribes. The Merovingian kings of the Germanic Franks conquered northern Gaul in 486 CE. Swabia became a duchy under the Frankish Empire in 496, following the Battle of Tolbiac; in 530 Saxons and Franks destroyed the Kingdom of Thuringia. In the 5th and 6th centuries the Merovingian kings conquered several other Germanic tribes and kingdoms. King Chlothar I (558–561) ruled the greater part of what is now Germany and made expeditions into Saxony, while the Southeast of modern Germany was still under influence of the Ostrogoths. Saxons inhabited the area down to the Unstrut River.

Regions of the Frankish Empire came under the control of autonomous dukes of mixed Frankish and native blood. Frankish Colonists were encouraged to move to the newly conquered territories. While the local Germanic tribes were allowed to preserve their laws, they were pressured into becoming Christians.

The German territories became part of Austrasia (meaning “eastern land”), the northeastern portion of the Kingdom of the Merovingian Franks. As a whole, Austrasia comprised parts of present-day France, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. After the death of the Frankish king Clovis I in 511, his four sons partitioned his kingdom including Austrasia. Authority over Austrasia passed back and forth from autonomy to kingly subjugation, as Frankish lands were alternately united and subdivided by the Merovingian kings.

In 718, Charles Martel, the Franconian Mayor of the Palace, made war against Saxony because of its help for the Neustrians. His son Carloman started a new war against Saxony in 743, because the Saxons gave aid to Duke Odilo of Bavaria.


Mask reliquary of
Charles the Great
in Aachen Cathedral

In 751, Pippin III, Mayor of the Palace under the Merovingian king, himself assumed the title of king and was anointed by the Church. Now the Frankish kings were set up as protectors of the pope, and Charles the Great launched a decades-long military campaign against their heathen rivals, the Saxons and the Avars. The campaigns and insurrections of the Saxon Wars lasted from 772 to 804. The Saxons and Avars were eventually overwhelmed: the people were forcibly converted to Christianity, their lands annexed by the Carolingian Empire.

Carolingian empire (751 – 843 CE)

After the death of Frankish king Pepin the Short in 768 CE, his son Charles consolidated his control over his kingdom and became known as “Charles the Great” or “Charlemagne.” From 771 until his death in 814, Charlemagne extended the Carolingian empire into northern Italy and the territories of all west Germanic peoples, including the Saxons and the Baiuvarii (Bavarians). In 800, Charlemagne’s authority was confirmed by his coronation as Holy Roman Emperor by the pope on Christmas Day in Rome. Imperial strongholds (Kaiserpfalzen) became economic and cultural centers, of which Aachen was the most famous.

Fighting among Charlemagne’s grandchildren caused the Carolingian empire to partition into several parts under the Treaty of Verdun (843), the Treaty of Meerssen (870), and the Treaty of Ribemont. The German region then developed out of the East Frankish kingdom, East Francia.

References: Wikipedia

 

East Francia

History of Germany between 844 – 918 CE

In medieval historiography, East Francia or the Kingdom of the East Franks forms the earliest stage of the Kingdom of Germany, lasting from about 840 until about 962. East Francia formed by division of the Carolingian Empire after the death of Emperor Louis the Pious.

In August 843, after three years of civil war following the death of Louis the Pious, his three sons and heirs signed the Treaty of Verdun. His namesake, Louis the German, received the eastern portion of mostly Germanic-speaking lands. The kingdom of West Francia went to Louis’s younger half-brother Charles the Bald and between their realms a kingdom of Middle Francia, incorporating Italy, was given their elder brother, the Emperor Lothair I. While West and Middle Francia contained the traditional Frankish ‘heartlands’, the East consisted mostly of lands only annexed to the Frankish empire in the eighth century. These included the duchies of Alemannia, Bavaria, Saxony and Thuringia, as well as the northern and eastern marches with the Danes and Slavs.

The external threat from marauding Vikings in the west and from Magyars in the east aggravated an already grave internal problem for the feudal dynasties of Charlemagne’s descendants. Feudalism, with its decentralization of military and territorial power, has at the best of times a tendency to foster regional independence. In periods of crisis, when regions required arms to repel invaders, it was almost inevitable that the feudal holders of large tracts of frontier territory grew in strength until capable of challenging their own king. Baronial contenders upset the succession to the throne in the west Frankish kingdom from the late 9th century and in the eastern kingdom a few years later.

In 911 the east Frankish king Louis the Child died without a male heir. The only legitimate claimant within the Carolingian dynasty was Charles III, ruler of the west Frankish kingdom. Rather than do homage to him, and reunite the empire of Charlemagne, the eastern Franks and the Saxons elected one of their own number to the vacant throne. Conrad, the duke of Franconia, became the German king. Although not of the Carolingian line, Conrad was nevertheless a Frank. Upon his death the Franks and the Saxons together elected a Saxon king. In 919 Henry I becomes the founder of a Saxon, Ottonian, dynasty.

References: Wikipedia

 

Ottonian Dynasty

History of Germany between 919 – 1024 CE

Ottonian dynasty

The Ottonian dynasty was a Saxon dynasty of German monarchs (919–1024 CE), named after its first Emperor Otto I, but also known as the Saxon dynasty after the family’s origin in the German stem duchy of Saxony. The Ottonian rulers were successors of the Carolingian dynasty in East Francia.

The east Frankish kingdom over which Henry I (Henry the Fowler) became king in 919 consisted of four great duchies – territories settled by tribes (such as the Baivarii and the Suebi) conquered by the Franks and converted to Christianity. Their leaders, becoming dukes in the Frankish feudal system, accepted the rule of any strong Frankish king but tended toward independence during other reigns. These four are Bavaria, Swabia, Saxony and the Franks’ own region, Franconia. Lorraine, a fifth duchy, was a frequently disputed territory between the east and west Frankish kingdoms. Henry succeeded in asserting at least nominal control over the five duchies (often called the stem duchies). His son Otto succeeded him in 936 CE.

Otto the Great


Grave of Otto I in Magdeburg

Otto I, Duke of Saxony upon the death of his father in 936, had himself elected king within a few weeks. He continued the work of unifying all of the German tribes into a single kingdom, greatly expanding the powers of the king at the expense of the aristocracy. Through strategic marriages and personal appointments, he installed members of his own family to the kingdom’s most important duchies. This, however, did not prevent his relatives from entering into civil war: both Otto’s brother Duke Henry of Bavaria and his son Duke Liudolf of Swabia revolted against his rule. Otto was able to suppress their uprisings. In consequence, the various dukes, who had previously been co-equals with the king, found themselves reduced to royal subjects under the king’s authority. His decisive victory over the Magyars at the Battle of Lechfeld in 955 ended the Hungarian invasions of Europe and secured his hold over his kingdom.

The defeat of the pagan Magyars earned King Otto the reputation as the savior of Christendom and the epithet “the Great”. He transformed the Church in Germany into a kind of proprietary church and a major royal power base to which he donated charity. His family was responsible for this German Church’s creation. By 961, Otto had conquered the Kingdom of Italy, a troublesome inheritance that none wanted, and extended his kingdom’s borders to the north, east, and south. In control of much of central and southern Europe, the patronage of Otto and his immediate successors triggered a limited cultural renaissance of the arts and architecture. He confirmed the 754 Donation of Pepin and, with recourse to the concept of translatio imperii in succession of Charlemagne, proceeded to Rome to have himself crowned Holy Roman Emperor by Pope John XII in 962. He even reached a settlement with the Byzantine emperor John I Tzimiskes by marrying his son and heir Otto II to John’s niece Theophanu. In 968 he established the Archbishopric of Magdeburg at his long-time residence.

Descendants

Co-ruler with his father since 961 and crowned emperor in 967, Otto II ascended the throne at the age of 18. By excluding the Bavarian line of Ottonians from the line of succession, he strengthened Imperial authority and secured his own son’s succession to the Imperial throne. During his reign, Otto II attempted to annex the whole of Italy into the Empire, bringing him into conflict with the Byzantine emperor and with the Saracens of the Fatimid Caliphate. His campaign against the Saracens ended in 982 with a disastrous defeat at the Battle of Stilo. Moreover in 983 Otto II experienced a Great Slav Rising against his rule.

Otto II died in 983 at the age of 28 after a ten-year reign. Succeeded by his three-year-old son Otto III as king, his sudden death plunged the Ottonian dynasty into crisis. During her regency for Otto III, the Byzantine princess Theophanu abandoned her late husband’s imperialistic policy and devoted herself entirely to furthering her own agenda in Italy.

When Otto III came of age, he concentrated on securing the rule in the Italian domains, installing his confidants Bruno of Carinthia and Gerbert of Aurillac as Popes. In 1000 he made a pilgrimage to the Congress of Gniezno in Poland, establishing the Archdiocese of Gniezno and confirming the royal status of the Piast ruler Bolesław I the Brave. Expelled from Rome in 1001, Otto III died at age 21 the next year, without an opportunity to reconquer the city.

The childless Otto III was succeeded by Henry II, a son of Duke Henry II of Bavaria. He was crowned king in 1002. Henry II spent the first years of his rule consolidating his political power on the borders of the German kingdom. He waged several campaigns against Bolesław I of Poland and then moved successfully to Italy where he was crowned emperor by Pope Benedict VIII on 14 February 1014. He reinforced his rule by endowing and founding numeorus dioceses, such as the Bishopric of Bamberg in 1007, intertwining the secular and ecclesiastical authority over the Empire. Pope Eugene III canonized Henry II in 1146 CE.

As his marriage with Cunigunde of Luxembourg remained childless, the Ottonian dynasty became extinct with the death of Henry II in 1024. The crown passed to Conrad II of the Salian dynasty, great-grandson of Liutgarde, a daughter of Otto I, and the Salian duke Conrad the Red of Lorraine. When King Rudolph III of Burgundy died without heirs on 2 February 1032, Conrad II successfully claimed also this kingship on the basis of an inheritance Emperor Henry II had extorted from the former in 1006, having invaded Burgundy to enforce his claim after Rudolph attempted to renounce it in 1016.

Ottonian Renaissance


Senkschmelz Cross in
Essen Cathedral

The Ottonian Renaissance was a limited “renaissance” of Byzantine and Late Antique art that accompanied the reigns of the first three the Ottonian emperors. The Ottonian Renaissance is recognized especially in the arts and architecture, invigorated by renewed contact with Constantinople, in some revived cathedral schools, such as that of Archbishop Bruno of Cologne, in the production of illuminated manuscripts from a handful of elite scriptoria, such as Quedlinburg Abbey, founded by Otto in 936, and in political ideology. The Imperial court became the center of religious and spiritual life, led by the example of women of the royal family.

A small group of Ottonian monasteries received direct sponsorship from the Emperor and bishops and produced some magnificent medieval illuminated manuscripts, the premier art form of the time. Corvey produced some of the first manuscripts, followed by the scriptorium at Hildesheim after 1000. The most famous Ottonian scriptorium was at the island monastery of Reichenau on Lake Constance: hardly any other works have formed the image of Ottonian art as much as the miniatures which originated there. One of the greatest Reichenau works was the Codex Egberti, containing narrative miniatures of the life of Christ, the earliest such cycle, in a fusion of styles including Carolingian traditions as well as traces of insular and Byzantine influences. Other well known manuscripts included the Reichenau Evangeliary, the Liuther Codex, the Pericopes of Henry II, the Bamberg Apocalypse and the Hitda Codex.

References: Wikipediahistoryworld.net

 

Salian Dynasty

History of Germany between 1025 – 1124 CE

The Salian dynasty was an age of four German Kings (1024–1125), Conrad II, Henry III, Henry IV, and Henry V. All of these kings were also crowned Holy Roman Emperor (1027–1125): the term Salic dynasty also applies to the Holy Roman Empire of the time as a separate term.

After the death of the last Saxon of the Ottonian Dynasty in 1024, Conrad II was first the elected German King and then three years later elected Holy Roman Emperor. Conrad II was the only son of Count Henry of Speyer and Adelheid of Alsace (both territories in the Franconia of that day). His election as German King happened in 1024 CE. Early in 1026 Conrad II went to Milan, where Ariberto, archbishop of Milan, crowned him king of Italy. When Rudolph III, King of Burgundy died in 1032, Conrad II also claimed this kingship based on inheritance Henry II had extorted from the former in 1006. Finally, he was crowned emperor of the Holy Roman Empire on 26 March 1027 CE.

The four Salian kings of the dynasty ruled the Holy Roman Empire from 1027 to 1125, and firmly established their monarchy as a major European power. They achieved the development of a permanent administrative system based on a class of public officials answerable to the crown.

Already in 1028, Conrad II had his son Henry III elected and anointed king of Germany. Henry’s tenure led to overstatement of sacral kingship. During this reign, Speyer Cathedral expanded to become the largest church in Western Christendom. Henry’s conception of a legitimate power of royal disposition in the duchies was successful against the dukes, and thus secured royal control. However in Lorraine, this led to years of conflict, from which Henry emerged as the winner. But also in southern Germany a powerful opposition group formed in the years 1052-1055. In 1046, Henry ended the papal schism, freed the Papacy from dependence on Roman nobility, and laid the basis for its universal applicability. His early death in 1056 was long regarded a disaster for the Empire.

Struggle with Pope

The early Salians owed much of their success to their alliance with the Church, a policy begun by Otto I, which gave them the material support they needed to subdue rebellious dukes. In time, however, the Church came to regret this close relationship. The alliance broke down in 1075 during what came to be known as the Investiture Controversy (or Investiture Dispute), a struggle in which the reformist Pope, Gregory VII, demanded that Emperor Henry IV renounce his rights over the Church in Germany. The pope also attacked the concept of monarchy by divine right and gained the support of significant elements of the German nobility interested in limiting imperial absolutism. More important, the pope forbade ecclesiastical officials under pain of excommunication to support Henry as they had so freely done in the past. In the end, Henry IV journeyed to Canossa in northern Italy in 1077 to do penance and to receive absolution from the pope. However, he resumed the practice of lay investiture (appointment of religious officials by civil authorities) and arranged the election of an antipope (Antipope Clement III) in 1080.


Speyer Cathedral, burial place
of all Salian Emperors

The monarch’s struggle with the papacy resulted in a war that ravaged the Holy Roman Empire from 1077 until the Concordat of Worms in 1122. The reign of the last ruler of the Salian dynasty Henry V coincided with the final phase of the great Investiture Controversy, which had pitted pope against emperor. By the settlement of the Concordat of Worms, Henry V surrendered to the demands of the second generation of Gregorian reformers. This agreement stipulated that the pope would appoint high-church officials but gave the German king the right to veto the papal choices. Imperial control of Italy was lost for a time, and the imperial crown became dependent on the political support of competing aristocratic factions. Feudalism also became more widespread as freemen sought protection by swearing allegiance to a lord. These powerful local rulers, having thereby acquired extensive territories and large military retinues, took over administration within their territories and organized it around an increasing number of castles. The most powerful of these local rulers came to be called princes rather than dukes.

According to the laws of the feudal system of the Holy Roman Empire, the king had no claims on the vassals of the other princes, only on those living within his family’s territory. Lacking the support of the formerly dependent vassals and weakened by the increasing hostility of the Church, the monarchy lost its pre-eminence. Thus the Investiture Contest strengthened local power in the Holy Roman Empire – in contrast to the trend in France and England, where centralized royal power grew. The Investiture Contest had an additional effect. The long struggle between emperor and pope hurt the Holy Roman Empire’s intellectual life, in this period largely confined to monasteries, and the empire no longer led or even kept pace with developments occurring in France and Italy. For instance, no universities were founded in the Holy Roman Empire until the fourteenth century.

End of the Dynasty

The first Hohenstaufen king Conrad III was a grandson of the Salian Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor. Agnes, Henry IV’s daughter and Henry V’s sister, was the heiress of Salian dynasty’s lands: her first marriage produced the royal and imperial Hohenstaufen dynasty and her second marriage the ducal Babenberg potentates of Duchy of Austria which was elevated primarily due to such connections, Privilegium Minus.

References: Wikipedia

 

Hohenstaufen Dynasty

History of Germany between 1125 – 1254 CE

The Hohenstaufen, also called the Staufer or Staufen, were a dynasty of German kings (1138–1254) during the Middle Ages. Besides Germany, they also ruled the Kingdom of Sicily (1194–1268). Three members of the dynasty—Frederick I, Henry VI and Frederick II—were crowned Holy Roman Emperor.


Hohenstaufen
Castle ruins

The family derives its name from the castle which the first Swabian duke of the lineage built there in the latter half of the 11th century. The name “Hohenstaufen”, meaning “high Staufen”, designated a dynasty of the 14th century. Staufen castle was only called Hohenstaufen by historians in the 19th century, to distinguish it from other castles of the same name. The name of the dynasty followed suit, but in recent decades, the trend in German historiography has been to prefer the name Staufer.

The noble family first appeared in the late 10th century in the Swabian Riesgau region around the former Carolingian court of Nördlingen. A local count Frederick (d. about 1075) is mentioned as progenitor in a pedigree drawn up by Abbot Wibald of Stavelot at the behest of Emperor Frederick Barbarossa in 1153. Upon Frederick’s death, he was succeeded by his son, Duke Frederick II, in 1105. Frederick II remained a close ally of the Salians, he and his younger brother Conrad were named the king’s representatives in Germany when the king was in Italy. Around 1120, Frederick II married Judith of Bavaria from the rival House of Welf.

Ruling in Germany

When the last male member of the Salian dynasty, Emperor Henry V, died without heirs in 1125, a controversy arose about the succession. Duke Frederick II and Conrad, the two current male Staufers, by their mother Agnes were grandsons of late Emperor Henry IV and nephews of Henry V. Frederick attempted to succeed to the throne of the Holy Roman Emperor (formally known as the King of the Romans) through a customary election, but lost to the Saxon duke Lothair of Supplinburg. A civil war between Frederick’s dynasty and Lothair’s ended with Frederick’s submission in 1134. After Lothair’s death in 1137, Frederick’s brother Conrad was elected King as Conrad III.

Conrad’s brother Duke Frederick II died in 1147, and was succeeded in Swabia by his son, Duke Frederick III. When King Conrad III died without adult heir in 1152, Frederick also succeeded him, taking both German royal and imperial titles.

Frederick Barbarossa


Frederick Barbarossa

Frederick I, known as Frederick Barbarossa because of his red beard, struggled throughout his reign to restore the power and prestige of the German monarchy against the dukes, whose power had grown both before and after the Investiture Controversy under his Salian predecessors. As royal access to the resources of the church in Germany was much reduced, Frederick was forced to go to Italy to find the finances needed to restore the king’s power in Germany. He was soon crowned emperor in Italy, but decades of warfare on the peninsula yielded scant results. The Papacy and the prosperous city-states of the Lombard League in northern Italy were traditional enemies, but the fear of Imperial domination caused them to join ranks to fight Frederick. Under the skilled leadership of Pope Alexander III, the alliance suffered many defeats but ultimately was able to deny the emperor a complete victory in Italy. Frederick returned to Germany. He had vanquished one notable opponent, his Welf cousin, Duke Henry the Lion of Saxony and Bavaria in 1180, but his hopes of restoring the power and prestige of the monarchy seemed unlikely to be met by the end of his life.

During Frederick’s long stays in Italy, the German princes became stronger and began a successful colonization of Slavic lands. Offers of reduced taxes and manorial duties enticed many Germans to settle in the east in the course of the Ostsiedlung. In 1163 Frederick waged a successful campaign against the Kingdom of Poland in order to re-install the Silesian dukes of the Piast dynasty. With the German colonization, the Empire increased in size and came to include the Duchy of Pomerania as well as Bohemia and the March of Moravia. A quickening economic life in Germany increased the number of towns and Imperial cities, and gave them greater importance. It was also during this period that castles and courts replaced monasteries as centers of culture. Growing out of this courtly culture, Middle High German literature reached its peak in lyrical love poetry, the Minnesang, and in narrative epic poems such as Tristan, Parzival, and the Nibelungenlied.

Henry VI

Frederick died in 1190 while on the Third Crusade and was succeeded by his son, Henry VI. Elected king even before his father’s death, Henry went to Rome to be crowned emperor. He married Queen Constance of Sicily, and a death in his wife’s family in 1194 gave him possession of the Kingdom of Sicily, a source of vast wealth. Henry failed to make royal and Imperial succession hereditary, but in 1196 he succeeded in gaining a pledge that his infant son Frederick would receive the German crown. Faced with difficulties in Italy and confident that he would realize his wishes in Germany at a later date, Henry returned to the south, where it appeared he might unify the peninsula under the Hohenstaufen name. After a series of military victories, however, he fell ill and died of natural causes in Sicily in 1197. His underage son Frederick could only succeed him in Sicily and Malta, while in the Empire the struggle between the House of Staufen and the House of Welf erupted once again.

Philip of Swabia

Because the election of a three-year-old boy to be German king appeared likely to make orderly rule difficult, the boy’s uncle, Duke Philip of Swabia, brother of late Henry VI, was designated to serve in his place. Other factions however favoured a Welf candidate. In 1198, two rival kings were chosen: the Hohenstaufen Philip of Swabia and the son of the deprived Duke Henry the Lion, the Welf Otto IV. A long civil war began; Philip was about to win when he was murdered by the Bavarian count palatine Otto VIII of Wittelsbach in 1208. Pope Innocent III initially had supported the Welfs, but when Otto, now sole elected monarch, moved to appropriate Sicily, Innocent changed sides and accepted young Frederick II and his ally, King Philip II of France, who defeated Otto at the 1214 Battle of Bouvines. Frederick had returned to Germany in 1212 from Sicily, where he had grown up, and was elected king in 1215. When Otto died in 1218, Fredrick became the undisputed ruler, and in 1220 was crowned Holy Roman Emperor.

Frederick II

Emperor Frederick II spent little time in Germany as his main concerns lay in Southern Italy. He founded the University of Naples in 1224 to train future state officials and reigned over Germany primarily through the allocation of royal prerogatives, leaving the sovereign authority and imperial estates to the ecclesiastical and secular princes. He made significant concessions to the German nobles, such as those put forth in an imperial statute of 1232, which made princes virtually independent rulers within their territories. These measures favored the further fragmentation of the Empire.

By the 1226 Golden Bull of Rimini, Frederick had assigned the military order of the Teutonic Knights to complete the conquest and conversion of the Prussian lands. A reconciliation with the Welfs took place in 1235, whereby Otto the Child, grandson of the late Saxon duke Henry the Lion, was named Duke of Brunswick and Lüneburg. The power struggle with the popes continued and resulted in Fredrick’s excommunication in 1227. In 1239, Pope Gregory IX excommunicated Fredrick again, and in 1245 he was condemned as a heretic by a church council. Although Frederick was one of the most energetic, imaginative, and capable rulers of the time, he was not concerned with drawing the disparate forces in Germany together. His legacy was thus that local rulers had more authority after his reign than before it. The clergy also had become more powerful.

By the time of Frederick’s death in 1250, little centralized power remained in Germany. The Great Interregnum, a period in which there were several elected rival kings, none of whom was able to achieve any position of authority, followed the death of Frederick’s son King Conrad IV of Germany in 1254. The German princes vied for individual advantage and managed to strip many powers away from the diminished monarchy. Rather than establish sovereign states however, many nobles tended to look after their families. Their many male heirs created more and smaller estates, and from a largely free class of officials previously formed, many of these assumed or acquired hereditary rights to administrative and legal offices. These trends compounded political fragmentation within Germany. The period ended in 1273 with the election of Rudolph of Habsburg, a godson of Frederick.

End of the Staufer dynasty

Conrad IV was succeeded as duke of Swabia by his only son, two-year-old Conradin. By this time, the office of duke of Swabia had been fully subsumed into the office of the king, and without royal authority had become meaningless. In 1261, attempts to elect young Conradin king were unsuccessful. He also had to defend Sicily against an invasion by Charles of Anjou, a brother of the French king. Charles had defeated Conradin’s uncle Manfred, King of Sicily in the Battle of Benevento on 26 February 1266. The king himself, refusing to flee, rushed into the midst of his enemies and was killed. Conradin’s campaign to retake control ended with his defeat in 1268 at the Battle of Tagliacozzo after which he was handed over to Charles, who had him publicly executed at Naples. With Conradin, the direct line of the Dukes of Swabia finally ceased to exist, though most of the later emperors were descended from the Staufer dynasty indirectly.

During the political decentralization of the late Staufer period, the population had grown from an estimated 8 million in 1200 to about 14 million in 1300, and the number of towns increased tenfold. The most heavily urbanized areas of Germany were located in the south and the west. Towns often developed a degree of independence, but many were subordinate to local rulers if not immediate to the emperor. Colonization of the east also continued in the thirteenth century, most notably through the efforts of the Teutonic Knights. German merchants also began trading extensively on the Baltic.

References: Wikipedia

 

Habsburg Dynasty

History of Germany between 1255 – 1516 CE

For almost twenty years after the death of Conrad IV in 1254, the German princes fail to elect any effective king or emperor. This period is usually known (with a grandiloquence to match the Great Schism in the papacy) as the Great Interregnum. It ended with the election of Rudolf I as German king in 1273. The choice subsequently seems of great significance, because he was the first Habsburg on the German throne. During the next century, the electors choose kings from several families.

Charles IV was crowned emperor in Rome in 1355. He made his capital in Prague (he has inherited Bohemia as well as Luxembourg), bringing the city its first period of glory. The imperial dignity remained in Charles’s family until 1438, when it transferred again to the Habsburgs. The real ascendancy of the Habsburgs began when Frederick V, the king of Germany from 1440, was crowned Holy Roman emperor as Frederick III in 1452. The Habsburgs married their way to the power. They began with Austria and then married the princesses from Netherlands, Burgundy, the duchy of Milan, Sicily and finally Spain merging countries under their power including all dominions on the American continent. The highpoint of Habsburg power came under Charles V (1500-58) who ruled over an empire over which the sun never set.

In 1356 Charles IV issues the “Golden Bull” which clarified the new identity which the Holy Roman empire had gradually adopted. It ended papal involvement in the election of a German king, by the simple means of denying Rome’s right to approve or reject the electors’ choice. The Golden Bull also clarified and formalized the process of election of a German king. The choice was traditionally been in the hands of seven electors, but their identity has varied. In return, by a separate agreement with the pope, Charles abandoned imperial claims in Italy – apart from a title to the kingdom of Lombardy, inherited from Charlemagne.

Imperial Cities


St. Mary’s Church, Lübeck

The fragmented political structure of Germany had certain advantages for the larger German towns. An elected emperor often found it difficult to control virtually independent territories, held by hereditary nobles or by dignitaries of the church. In such circumstances there may had a natural alliance between the emperor and the citizens of a prosperous borough – who frequently had their own grudge against their local feudal overlord. The rich burghers were able to help the emperor with funds or troops for his armies and he was able help burghers with privileges to protect their trade. Gradually, over the centuries, a premier league of German cities began to emerge. Such cities ran their own affairs and make alliances among themselves for mutual benefit, even put armies into the field to enforce their interests. Each of them was ran by a Rat, or council, membership of which is often limited to the leading local families. Imperial cities were inclined to group together in large trading alliances – of which the Hanseatic League is the best known example. A document of 1422 lists 75 free German cities. They included many of the most distinguished places in early German history – Aachen, Cologne, Lübeck, Hamburg, Bremen, Dortmund, Frankfurt am Main, Regensburg, Augsburg, Nuremberg, Ulm. From 1489 all the free cities were formally represented in the imperial diet.

The Hanseatic League was a commercial and defensive confederation of merchant guilds and their market towns (like Lübeck, Rostock and Wismar). It dominated Baltic maritime trade (c. 1400-1800) along the coast of Northern Europe. It stretched from the Baltic to the North Sea and inland during the Late Middle Ages and early modern period.

Population and Economy

Around 1350 Germany and almost the whole of Europe were ravaged by the Black Death. Jews suffered persecution on religious and economic grounds; many fled to Poland. The Black Death killed an estimated 30–60 percent of Europe’s population in the 14th century. After the plague and other disasters of the 14th century, the early-modern European society gradually came into being as a result of economic, religious, and political changes. A money economy arose which provoked social discontent among knights and peasants. Gradually, a proto-capitalistic system evolved out of feudalism. The Fugger family gained prominence through commercial and financial activities and became financiers to both ecclesiastical and secular rulers. The knightly classes found their monopoly on arms and military skill undermined by the introduction of mercenary armies and foot soldiers. Predatory activity by “robber knights” became common.

During his reign from 1493 to 1519, Maximilian I tried to reform the Empire. An Imperial supreme court was established, imperial taxes were levied, and the power of the Imperial Diet was increased. The reforms, however, were frustrated by the continued territorial fragmentation of the Empire.

References: WikipediaHistoryworld.netHyperhistory.com

 

Reformation and Wars of Religion

History of Germany between 1517 – 1617 CE

Reformation


Martin Luther’s Bible
translated into German (1534).

In the early 16th century there was much discontent in Germany occasioned by abuses such as indulgences in the Catholic Church, and a general desire for reform. In 1517 the Reformation began with the publication of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses; he posted them in the town square and gave copies of them to German nobles, but it is debated whether he nailed them to the church door in Wittenberg as is commonly said. The list detailed 95 assertions Luther believed to show corruption and misguidance within the Catholic Church. One often cited example, though perhaps not Luther’s chief concern, is a condemnation of the selling of indulgences; another prominent point within the 95 Theses is Luther’s disagreement both with the way in which the higher clergy, especially the pope, used and abused power, and with the very idea of the pope.

In 1521 Luther was outlawed at the Diet of Worms. But the Reformation spread rapidly, helped by the Emperor Charles V’s wars with France and the Turks. Hiding in the Wartburg Castle, Luther translated the Bible from Latin to German, establishing the basis of the German language. A curious fact is that Luther spoke a dialect which had minor importance in the German language of that time. After the publication of his Bible, his dialect suppressed the others and evolved into what is now the modern German.

German Peasants’ War

In 1524 the German Peasants’ War broke out in Swabia, Franconia and Thuringia against ruling princes and lords, following the preaching of Reformers. But the revolts, which were assisted by war-experienced noblemen like Götz von Berlichingen and Florian Geyer (in Franconia), and by the theologian Thomas Münzer (in Thuringia), were soon repressed by the territorial princes. As many as 100,000 German peasants were massacred during the revolt. With the protestation of the Lutheran princes at the Imperial Diet of Speyer (1529) and rejection of the Lutheran “Augsburg Confession” at Augsburg (1530), a separate Lutheran church emerged.

From 1545 the Counter-Reformation began in Germany. The main force was provided by the Jesuit order, founded by the Spaniard Ignatius of Loyola. Central and northeastern Germany were by this time almost wholly Protestant, whereas western and southern Germany remained predominantly Catholic. In 1547, Holy Roman Emperor Charles V defeated the Schmalkaldic League, an alliance of Protestant rulers. The Peace of Augsburg in 1555 brought recognition of the Lutheran faith. But the treaty also stipulated that the religion of a state was to be that of its ruler.

The Augsburg formula preserves for half a century an uneasy peace in the German lands, while princes use their religious freedom as a form of diplomacy. In 1608/1609 the Protestant Union and the Catholic League were formed. Early in the 17th century the two sides form up in opposing blocs, each headed by a branch of the Wittelsbach family. The Wittelsbachs of the Rhine Palatinate, in southwest Germany, are Calvinist; they lead the Protestant Union, formed in 1608. The Wittelsbachs of Bavaria, just to the east, form the Catholic League in the following year.

This confrontation does not immediately lead to armed conflict – until the Protestants of distant Bohemia elect as their king, in 1619, the Calvinist Wittelsbach, Frederick V. The response by the Catholic League, in alliance with pope and emperor, becomes one of the opening encounters of the Thirty Years’ War.

References: WikipediaHistoryworld.net

 

Thirty Years War & Rise of Prussia

History of Germany between 1618 – 1739


Map of the Thirty Years’ War

From 1618 to 1648 the Thirty Years’ War ravaged the Holy Roman Empire. The causes were the conflicts between Catholics and Protestants, the efforts by the various states within the Empire to increase their power and the Catholic Emperor’s attempt to achieve the religious and political unity of the Empire. The immediate occasion for the war was the uprising of the Protestant nobility of Bohemia against the emperor, but the conflict widened into a European War with the intervention of King Christian IV of Denmark (1625–29), Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden (1630–48) and France under Cardinal Richelieu. Germany became the main theatre of war and the scene of the final conflict between France and the Habsburgs for predominance in Europe.

The fighting often was out of control, with marauding bands of hundreds or thousands of starving soldiers spreading plague, plunder, and murder. The armies that were under control moved back and forth across the countryside year after year, levying heavy taxes on cities, and seizing the animals and food stocks of the peasants without payment. The enormous social disruption over three decades caused a dramatic decline in population because of killings, disease, crop failures, declining birth rates and random destruction, and the out-migration of terrified people. One estimate shows a 38% drop from 16 million people in 1618 to 10 million by 1650, while another shows “only” a 20% drop from 20 million to 16 million. The Altmark and Württemberg regions were especially hard hit. It took generations for Germany to fully recover.

The war ended in 1648 with the Peace of Westphalia. Alsace was permanently lost to France, Pomerania was temporarily lost to Sweden, and the Netherlands officially left the Empire. Imperial power declined further as the states’ rights increased.

Rise of Brandenburg-Prussia

From 1640, Brandenburg-Prussia had started to rise under the Great Elector, Frederick William. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 strengthened it even further, through the acquisition of East Pomerania. The second half of the 17th century laid the basis for Prussia to become one of the great players in European politics later on. The emerging Brandenburg-Prussian military potential, based on the introduction of a standing army in 1653, was symbolized by the widely noted victories in Warsaw (1656) and Fehrbellin (1675) and by the Great Sleigh Drive (1678). Brandenburg-Prussia also established a navy and German colonies in the Brandenburger Gold Coast and Arguin. Frederick William, known as “The Great Elector”, opened Brandenburg-Prussia to large-scale immigration of mostly Protestant refugees from all across Europe, most notably Huguenot immigration following the Edict of Potsdam. Frederick William also started to centralize Brandenburg-Prussia’s administration and reduce the influence of the estates.

In 1701, Frederick III, Elector of Brandenburg, succeeded in elevating his status to King in Prussia. This was made possible by the Duchy of Prussia’s sovereign status outside the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, and approval by the Habsburg emperor and other European royals in the course of forming alliances for the War of the Spanish succession and the Great Northern War. From 1701 onward, the Hohenzollern domains were referred to as the Kingdom of Prussia, or simply Prussia. Legally, the personal union between Brandenburg and Prussia continued until the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806. However, by this time the emperor’s overlordship over the empire had become a legal fiction. Hence, after 1701, Brandenburg was de facto treated as part of the Prussian kingdom. Frederick and his successors continued to centralize and expand the state, transforming the personal union of politically diverse principalities typical for the Brandenburg-Prussian era into a system of provinces subordinate to Berlin.

From 1713 to 1740, King Frederick William I, also known as the “Soldier King”, established a highly centralized, militarized state with a heavily rural population of about three million (compared to the nine million in Austria).

References: Wikipedia

 

Emerging States

History of Germany between 1740 – 1788

The dominant factor in 18th-century German history was undoubtedly the emergence of Prussia as the main rival to Austria, which had long been the leading state within the German empire. Prussia grew in stature for several reasons – through Frederick the Great’s seizure of the rich province of Silesia, through the personal prestige acquired by Frederick himself, and through the vast gain of territory in the successive partitions of Poland. But certain other states were also be identified at this time as likely players in the struggles which will eventually lead, in the 19th century, to a united Germany.


Frederick II the Great,
reigned 1740-1786

Saxony began the 18th century as a very significant power. The state was weakened in subsequent decades, through disastrous involvement in Poland and because it was between the archrivals Prussia and Austria. Even so, Saxony’s size and large population gave it an undeniable importance.

Hanover acquired an entirely new stature during the century, from the personal link with Britain after the elector succeeds to the British throne in 1714 as George I. In the wars of the 18th century, Hanover had a special importance and exposure, as Britain’s continental outpost.

Bavaria, ruled by the Wittelsbachs, had played a major role in German history from early medieval times. In recent centuries a division between two branches of the family had somewhat reduced its status. From 1329, the western region went its own way as the Palatinate of the Rhine. The split was accentuated in the Reformation, when the Palatinate became Protestant while Bavaria remained Roman Catholic.

The Palatinate returned to the Catholic fold in 1685, and by the end of the 18th century, this line has recovered the entire inheritance. In 1777, the Bavarian line of the dynasty died out. The region reunited under the rule of the Palatine branch.

Wars

In the War of Austrian Succession (1740–1748) Maria Theresa fought successfully for recognition of her succession to the throne. But in the Silesian Wars and in the Seven Years’ War she had to cede 95 percent of Silesia to Frederick the Great of Prussia. After the Peace of Hubertsburg in 1763 between Austria, Prussia and Saxony, Prussia won recognition as a great power, thus launching a century-long rivalry with Austria for the leadership of the German peoples.

In 1772–1795 Prussia took the lead in the partitions of Poland, with Austria and Russia splitting the rest. Prussia occupied the western territories of the former Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth that surrounded existing Prussian holdings. This occupation led over a century of Polish resistance until Poland again became independent in 1918.

Culture and Enlightenment

Before 1750 the German upper classes looked to France for intellectual, cultural and architectural leadership; French was the language of high society. By the mid-18th century the Enlightenment had transformed German high culture in music, philosophy, science and literature. Christian Wolff (1679–1754) was the pioneer as a writer who expounded the Enlightenment to German readers; he legitimized German as a philosophic language. German music, sponsored by the upper classes, came of age under composers Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750), Joseph Haydn (1732–1809), and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791).

Remote Königsberg philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom, and political authority. Kant’s work contained basic tensions that would continue to shape German thought – and indeed all of European philosophy – well into the 20th century.

The German Enlightenment won the support of princes, aristocrats, and the middle classes, and it permanently reshaped the culture.

From 1763, against resistance from the nobility and citizenry, an “enlightened absolutism” established in Prussia and Austria, according to which the ruler governed according to the best precepts of the philosophers. The economies developed and legal reforms followed, including the abolition of torture and improvement in the status of Jews. Emancipation of the peasants slowly began. Compulsory education was instituted.

References: WikipediaHistoryworld.net

 

German Mediatization & French Revolution (1789-1814)

History of Germany between 1789 – 1814

French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars

German reaction to the French Revolution in 1789 was mixed at first. German intellectuals celebrated the outbreak, hoping to see the triumph of Reason and The Enlightenment. The royal courts in Vienna and Berlin denounced the overthrow of the king and the threatened spread of notions of liberty, equality, and fraternity. By 1793, the execution of the French king and the onset of the Terror disillusioned the educated middle class. Reformers said the solution was to have faith in the ability of Germans to reform their laws and institutions in peaceful fashion.

Europe experienced two decades of war revolving around France’s efforts to spread its revolutionary ideals, and the opposition of reactionary royalty. War broke out in 1792 as Austria and Prussia invaded France, but were defeated at the Battle of Valmy (1792). The German lands saw armies marching back and forth, bringing devastation, but also bringing new ideas of liberty and civil rights for the people. Prussia and Austria ended their failed wars with France but (with Russia) partitioned Poland among themselves in 1793 and 1795. The French took control of the Rhineland, imposed French-style reforms, abolished feudalism, established constitutions, promoted freedom of religion, emancipated Jews, opened the bureaucracy to ordinary citizens of talent, and forced the nobility to share power with the rising middle class. Napoleon created the Kingdom of Westphalia (1807–1813) as a model state. These reforms proved largely permanent and modernized the western parts of Germany. When the French tried to impose the French language, German opposition grew in intensity. A Second Coalition of Britain, Russia, and Austria then attacked France but failed. Napoleon established direct or indirect control over most of western Europe, including the German states apart from Prussia and Austria. The old Holy Roman Empire was little more than a farce; Napoleon simply abolished it in 1806 while forming new countries under his control. In Germany Napoleon set up the “Confederation of the Rhine,” comprising most of the German states except Prussia and Austria.

Prussia tried to remain neutral while imposing tight controls on dissent, but with German nationalism sharply on the rise, the small nation blundered by going to war with Napoleon in 1806. Its economy was weak, its leadership poor, and the once mighty Prussian army was a hollow shell. Napoleon easily crushed it at the Battle of Jena (1806). Napoleon occupied Berlin, and Prussia paid dearly. Prussia lost its recently acquired territories in western Germany, its army was reduced to 42,000 men, no trade with Britain was allowed, and Berlin had to pay Paris heavy reparations and fund the French army of occupation. Saxony changed sides to support Napoleon and join his Confederation of the Rhine; its elector was rewarded with the title of king and given a slice of Poland taken from Prussia.

After Napoleon’s fiasco in Russia in 1812, including the deaths of many Germans in his invasion army, Prussia joined with Russia. Major battles followed in quick order, and when Austria switched sides to oppose Napoleon his situation grew tenuous. He was defeated in a great Battle of Leipzig in late 1813, and Napoleon’s empire started to collapse. One after another the German states switched to oppose Napoleon, but he rejected peace terms. Allied armies invaded France in early 1814, Paris fell, and in April Napoleon surrendered. He returned for 100 days in 1815, but was finally defeated by the British and German armies at Waterloo. Prussia was the big winner at the Vienna peace conference, gaining extensive territory.

German mediatization

German mediatization was the major territorial restructuring that took place between 1802 and 1814 in Germany and the surrounding region by means of the mass mediatization and secularization of a large number of Imperial Estates: ecclesiastical principalities, free imperial cities, secular principalities and other minor self-ruling entities that lost their independent status and were absorbed into the remaining states.

The mass mediatization and secularization of German states that took place at the time was not initiated by Germans. It came under relentless military and diplomatic pressure from revolutionary France and Napoleon. It constituted the most extensive redistribution of property and territories in German history prior to 1945.

The two highpoints of the process were the secularization/annexation of ecclesiastical territories and free imperial cities in 1802–03, and the mediatization of secular principalities and counties in 1806.

Reference: Wikipedia

 

German Confederation

History of Germany between 1815 – 1866

The German Confederation was a loose association of 39 German states in Central Europe, created by the Congress of Vienna in 1815 to coordinate the economies of separate German-speaking countries and to replace the former Holy Roman Empire. Most historians have judged the Confederation to be weak and ineffective, as well as an obstacle to German nationalist aspirations. It collapsed due to the rivalry between Prussia and Austria, warfare, the 1848 revolution, and the inability of the multiple members to compromise. It dissolved after the Prussian victory in the Seven Weeks’ War of 1866.

In 1848, revolutions by liberals and nationalists failed in their attempts to establish a unified German state. Talks between the German states failed in 1848, and the Confederation briefly dissolved but was re-established in 1850.

The dispute between the two dominant member states of the Confederation, Austria and Prussia, over which had the inherent right to rule German lands ended in favor of Prussia after the Seven Weeks’ War of 1866. This led to the creation of the North German Confederation under Prussian leadership in 1867. A number of South German states remained independent, allied first with Austria (until 1867) and subsequently with Prussia (until 1871), after which they became a part of the new German Empire.


Austrian chancellor
Klemens von Metternich

Industrialization

Before 1850 Germany lagged far behind the leaders in industrial development – Britain, France, and Belgium. In 1800, Germany’s social structure was poorly suited to entrepreneurship or economic development. Domination by France during the era of the French Revolution (1790s to 1815), however, produced important institutional reforms. Reforms included the abolition of feudal restrictions on the sale of large landed estates, the reduction of the power of the guilds in the cities, and the introduction of a new, more efficient commercial law. Nevertheless, traditionalism remained strong in most of Germany. Until mid-century, the guilds, the landed aristocracy, the churches, and the government bureaucracies had so many rules and restrictions that entrepreneurship was held in low esteem, and given little opportunity to develop. From the 1830s and 1840s, Prussia, Saxony, and other states reorganized agriculture. The introduction of sugar beets, turnips, and potatoes yielded a higher level of food production, which enabled a surplus rural population to move to industrial areas. The beginnings of the industrial revolution in Germany came in the textile industry, and was facilitated by eliminating tariff barriers through the Zollverein, starting in 1834.

Science and culture

German artists and intellectuals, heavily influenced by the French Revolution and by the great German poet and writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), turned to Romanticism after a period of Enlightenment. Philosophical thought was decisively shaped by Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827) was the leading composer of Romantic music. His use of tonal architecture in such a way as to allow significant expansion of musical forms and structures was immediately recognized as bringing a new dimension to music. His later piano music and string quartets, especially, showed the way to a completely unexplored musical universe, and influenced Franz Schubert (1797–1828) and Robert Schumann (1810–1856). In opera, a new Romantic atmosphere combining supernatural terror and melodramatic plot in a folkloric context was first successfully achieved by Carl Maria von Weber (1786–1826) and perfected by Richard Wagner (1813–1883) in his Ring Cycle. The Brothers Grimm (1785–1863 & 1786–1859) not only collected folk stories into the popular Grimm’s Fairy Tales, but were also linguists, now counted among the founding fathers of German studies. The Brothers Grimm won the commission to begin the The German Dictionary, which remains the most comprehensive work on the German language.

Reference: Wikipedia

 

German Empire

History of Germany between 1867 – 1918

The German Empire was the historical German nation state that existed from the unification of Germany in 1871 to the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II in November 1918, when Germany became a federal republic.

After 1850, the states of Germany rapidly industrialized, with particular strengths in coal, iron (and later steel), chemicals, and railways. In 1871, it had a population of 41 million people, and by 1913, this had increased to 68 million. A heavily rural collection of states in 1815, the united Germany became predominantly urban. During its 47 years of existence, the German Empire operated as an industrial, technological, and scientific giant, gaining more Nobel Prizes in science than any other country.

Germany became a great power, boasting a rapidly growing rail network, the world’s strongest army, and a fast-growing industrial base. In less than a decade, its navy became second only to Britain’s Royal Navy.

On 10 December 1870, the North German Confederation Reichstag gave the title of German Emperor to William I, the King of Prussia. He was succeeded by Frederick III (for only 99 days before his death in 1888) and Wilhelm II (1888-1918).


Imperial Germany 1871–1918

Franco-Prussian War

The Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871) was a conflict between the Second French Empire and the German states of the North German Confederation led by the Kingdom of Prussia. The conflict was caused by Prussian ambitions to extend German unification. Some historians argue that the Prussian chancellor Otto von Bismarck planned to provoke a French attack in order to draw the southern German states into an alliance with the North German Confederation dominated by Prussia.

A series of swift Prussian and German victories in eastern France, culminating in the Siege of Metz and the Battle of Sedan, saw the army of the Second Empire decisively defeated. Following the Siege of Paris, the capital fell on 28 January 1871 and then a revolutionary uprising called the Paris Commune seized power in the capital and held it for two months, until it was bloodily suppressed by the regular French army at the end of May 1871.

The German states proclaimed their union as the German Empire under the Prussian king, Wilhelm I, uniting Germany as a nation-state. The Treaty of Frankfurt of 10 May 1871 gave Germany most of Alsace and some parts of Lorraine, which became the Imperial territory of Alsace-Lorraine. The German conquest of France and the unification of Germany upset the European balance of power, that had existed since the Congress of Vienna in 1815 and Otto von Bismarck maintained great authority in international affairs for two decades. French determination to regain Alsace-Lorraine and fear of another Franco-German war, along with British apprehension about the balance of power, became factors in the causes of World War I.

World War I

When the great crisis of 1914 arrived, the German Empire had only one ally – Austria-Hungary. They were later joined by the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria to form the Central Powers or Quadruple Alliance.

In the First World War, German plans to capture Paris quickly in autumn 1914 failed, and the war on the Western Front became a stalemate. The Allied naval blockade caused severe shortages of food. Germany was repeatedly forced to send troops to bolster Austria and Turkey on other fronts. However, Germany had great success on the Eastern Front; it occupied large Eastern territories following the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. German declaration of unrestricted submarine warfare in early 1917 was designed to strangle the British; it failed, because of the use of a trans-Atlantic convoy system. But the declaration brought the United States into the war. Meanwhile, German civilians and soldiers had become war-weary and radicalized by the Russian Revolution.

The high command under Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff increasingly controlled the country, as they gambled on one last offensive in spring 1918 before the Americans could arrive in force, using large numbers of troops and artillery withdrawn from the Eastern Front. This failed, and by October the armies were in retreat, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottoman Empire had collapsed, and the German people had lost faith in their political system. The Empire collapsed in the November 1918 Revolution as the Emperor and all the ruling monarchs abdicated, and a republic took over.

Reference: Wikipedia

 

Weimar Republic

History of Germany between 1919 – 1932


German losses after Word War I

 

The humiliating peace terms in the Treaty of Versailles provoked bitter indignation throughout Germany, and seriously weakened the new democratic regime. The greatest enemies of democracy had already been constituted. In December 1918, the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) was founded, and in 1919, it tried and failed to overthrow the new republic. Adolf Hitler in 1919 took control of the new National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), which failed in a coup in Munich in 1923. Both parties, as well as parties supporting the republic, built militant auxiliaries that engaged in increasingly violent street battles. Electoral support for both parties increased after 1929 as the Great Depression hit the economy hard, producing many unemployed men who became available for the paramilitary units.

The early years


A disabled war veteran reduced to
begging, Berlin, 1923.

On 11 August 1919 the Weimar constitution came into effect, with Friedrich Ebert as first President. In the first months of 1920, the Reichswehr was to be reduced to 100,000 men, in accordance with the Treaty of Versailles. This included the dissolution of many Freikorps – units made up of volunteers. In an attempt at a coup d’état in March 1920, the Kapp Putsch, extreme right-wing politician Wolfgang Kapp let Freikorps soldiers march on Berlin and proclaimed himself Chancellor of the Reich. After four days the coup d’état collapsed, due to popular opposition and lack of support by the civil servants and the officers. Other cities were shaken by strikes and rebellions, which were bloodily suppressed.

Germany was the first state to establish diplomatic relations with the new Soviet Union. Under the Treaty of Rapallo, Germany accorded the Soviet Union de jure recognition, and the two signatories mutually cancelled all pre-war debts and renounced war claims.

When Germany defaulted on its reparation payments, French and Belgian troops occupied the heavily industrialised Ruhr district (January 1923). The German government encouraged the population of the Ruhr to passive resistance: shops would not sell goods to the foreign soldiers, coal-mines would not dig for the foreign troops, trams in which members of the occupation army had taken seat would be left abandoned in the middle of the street. The passive resistance proved effective, insofar as the occupation became a loss-making deal for the French government. But the Ruhr fight also led to hyperinflation, and many who lost all their fortune would become bitter enemies of the Weimar Republic, and voters of the anti-democratic right. See 1920s German inflation.

In September 1923, the deteriorating economic conditions led Chancellor Gustav Stresemann to call an end to the passive resistance in the Ruhr. In November, his government introduced a new currency, Reichsmark, together with other measures to stop the hyperinflation. In the following six years the economic situation improved. In 1928, Germany’s industrial production even regained the pre-war levels of 1913.

Great depression

The Wall Street Crash of 1929 marked the beginning of the worldwide Great Depression, which hit Germany as hard as any nation. In July 1931, the Darmstätter und Nationalbank – one of the biggest German banks – failed. In early 1932, the number of unemployed had soared to more than 6,000,000.

On top of the collapsing economy came a political crisis: the political parties represented in the Reichstag were unable to build a governing majority in the face of escalating extremism from the far right (the Nazis, NSDAP) and the far left (the Communists, KPD). In March 1930, President Hindenburg appointed Heinrich Brüning Chancellor. To push through his package of austerity measures against a majority of Social Democrats, Communists and the NSDAP (Nazis), Brüning made use of emergency decrees and dissolved Parliament. In March and April 1932, Hindenburg was re-elected in the German presidential election of 1932.

The Nazi Party was the largest party in the national elections of 1932. On 30 January 1933, pressured by former Chancellor Franz von Papen and other conservatives, President Hindenburg appointed Hitler as Chancellor.

Science and culture

The Weimar years saw a flowering of German science and high culture, before the Nazi regime resulted in a decline in the scientific and cultural life in Germany and forced many renowned scientists and writers to flee. German recipients dominated the Nobel prizes in science. Germany dominated the world of physics before 1933, led by Hermann von Helmholtz, Joseph von Fraunhofer, Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, Albert Einstein, Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg. Chemistry likewise was dominated by German professors and researchers at the great chemical companies such as BASF and Bayer and persons like Fritz Haber. Theoretical mathematicians included Carl Friedrich Gauss in the 19th century and David Hilbert in the 20th century. Carl Benz, the inventor of the automobile, was one of the pivotal figures of engineering.

Among the most important German writers were Thomas Mann (1875–1955), Hermann Hesse (1877–1962) and Bertolt Brecht (1898–1956). The pessimistic historian Oswald Spengler wrote The Decline of the West (1918–23) on the inevitable decay of Western Civilization, and influenced intellectuals in Germany such as Martin Heidegger, Max Scheler, and the Frankfurt School, as well as intellectuals around the world.

After 1933, Nazi proponents of “Aryan physics,” led by the Nobel Prize-winners Johannes Stark and Philipp Lenard, attacked Einstein’s theory of relativity as a degenerate example of Jewish materialism in the realm of science. Many scientists and humanists emigrated; Einstein moved permanently to the U.S. but some of the others returned after 1945.

Reference: Wikipedia

 

Nazi Germany

History of Germany between 1933 – 1945

In order to secure a majority for his Nazi Party in the Reichstag, Hitler called for new elections in 1933. On the evening of 27 February 1933, a fire was set in the Reichstag building. Hitler swiftly blamed an alleged Communist uprising, and convinced President Hindenburg to sign the Reichstag Fire Decree. This decree, which would remain in force until 1945, repealed important political and human rights of the Weimar constitution. Eleven thousand Communists and Socialists were arrested and brought into hastily prepared Nazi concentration camps and 9,000 were found guilty and most executed.

From 1933, the Nazi regime restored economic prosperity and ended mass unemployment using heavy spending on the military, while suppressing labor unions and strikes. The return of prosperity gave the Nazi Party enormous popularity, with only minor, isolated and subsequently unsuccessful cases of resistance among the German population over the 12 years of rule. The Gestapo (secret police) under Heinrich Himmler destroyed the political opposition and persecuted the Jews, trying to force them into exile, while taking their property. The Party took control of the courts, local government, and all civic organizations except the Protestant and Catholic churches. All expressions of public opinion were controlled by Hitler’s propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, who made effective use of film, mass rallies, and Hitler’s hypnotic speaking.

However, many leaders of the Nazi SA (Sturmabteilung) were disappointed. Hitler had long been at odds with Chief Röhm and felt increasingly threatened by these plans and in the “Night of the Long Knives” in 1934 killed Röhm and the top SA leaders using their notorious homosexuality as an excuse. The SS became an independent organization under the command of the Reichsführer SS Heinrich Himmler. He would become the supervisor of the Gestapo and of the concentration camps, soon also of the ordinary police. Hitler also established the Waffen-SS as a separate troop.

Military

Hitler re-established the Luftwaffe (air force) and reintroduced universal military service. This was in breach of the Treaty of Versailles; Britain, France and Italy issued notes of protest. Hitler had the officers swear their personal allegiance to him. In 1936 German troops marched into the demilitarized Rhineland. Britain and France did not intervene. The move strengthened Hitler’s standing in Germany. His reputation swelled further with the 1936 Summer Olympics, which were held in the same year in Berlin, and which proved another great propaganda success for the regime as orchestrated by master propagandist Joseph Goebbels.

Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust

The Nazi regime was particularly hostile towards Jews, who became the target of unending anti-Semitic propaganda attacks. The Nazis attempted to convince the German people to view and treat Jews as “subhumans” and immediately after winning in the 1933 federal elections the Nazis imposed a nationwide boycott of Jewish businesses. On March 20, 1933, the first Nazi concentration camp was established at Dachau in Bavaria and from 1933 to 1935, the Nazi regime consolidated their power and imposed the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 which banned all Jews from civil service and academics positions. Jews lost their German citizenship, and a ban on sexual relations between people classified as “Aryans” and “non-Aryans” was created. Jews continued to suffer persecution under the Nazi regime, exemplified by the Kristallnacht pogrom of 1938, and about half of Germany’s 500,000 Jews fled the country before 1939, after which escape became almost impossible.

In 1941, the Nazi leadership decided to implement a plan that they called the “Final Solution” which came to be known as the Holocaust. Under the plan, Jews and other “lesser races” along with political opponents from Germany as well as occupied countries were systematically murdered at murder sites, Nazi concentration camps, and starting in 1942, at extermination camps. Between 1941 and 1945 Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, communists, homosexuals, the mentally and physically disabled and members of other groups were targeted and methodically murdered in the largest genocide of the 20th century. In total approximately 11 million people were killed during the Holocaust including 1.1 million children.

World War II

At first Germany’s military moves were brilliantly successful, as in the “blitzkrieg” invasions of Poland (1939), Norway (1940), the Low Countries (1940), and above all the stunningly successful invasion and quick conquest of France in 1940. Hitler probably wanted peace with Britain in late 1940, but Prime Minister Winston Churchill, standing alone, was dogged in his defiance. Churchill had major financial, military, and diplomatic help from President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the U.S., another implacable foe of Hitler. Hitler’s emphasis on maintaining high living standards postponed the full mobilization of the national economy until 1942, years after the great rivals Britain, Russia, and the U.S. had fully mobilized. Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 – weeks behind schedule – but swept forward until it reached the gates of Moscow.

The tide turned in December 1941, when the invasion of Russia stalled in cold weather and the United States joined the war. After surrender in North Africa and losing the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942–43, the Germans were on the defensive. By late 1944, the United States, Canada, France, and Great Britain were closing in on Germany in the West, while the Soviets were closing from the East. An estimated 353,000 civilians were killed by British and American strategic bombing of German cities, and nine million were left homeless.

Nazi Germany collapsed as Berlin was taken by the Red Army in a fight to the death on the city streets. Hitler committed suicide on 30 April 1945. Final German surrender was signed on 8 May 1945.

By September 1945, the Third Reich and its Axis partners (Italy and Japan) had been defeated, chiefly by the forces of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain. Much of Europe lay in ruins, over 60 million people had been killed (most of them civilians), including approximately 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews in what became known as the Holocaust. World War II resulted in the destruction of Germany’s political and economic infrastructure and led directly to its partition, considerable loss of territory, and historical legacy of guilt and shame.

Reference: Wikipedia

 

Cold War and Division

History of Germany between 1946 – 1989

As a consequence of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, Germany was split between the two global blocs in the East and West, a period known as the division of Germany. Germany was stripped of its war gains and lost territories in the east to Poland and the Soviet Union. Seven million prisoners and forced laborers left Germany, most of whom died either during their emigration of starvation, due to harsh conditions, or because they were worked to death. The total of German war dead was 8% to 10% out of a prewar population. Over 10 million German-speaking refugees arrived in Germany from other countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Many German POWs became forced laborers to provide restitution to the countries Germany had devastated in the war and some industrial equipment was removed as reparations.

At the Potsdam Conference, Allies divided Germany into four military occupation zones and it did not regain independence until 1949. The Cold War divided Germany between the Allies in the west and Soviets in the east. Germans had little voice in government until 1949 when two states emerged; the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) was a parliamentary democracy with a capitalist economic system and free churches and labor unions. The other new state was the smaller German Democratic Republic (GDR, or East Germany), a Marxist-Leninist dictatorship with its leadership dominated by the Soviet-aligned Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED) which retained it within the Soviet sphere of influence.

West Germany (Bonn Republic)

In 1949, the three western occupation zones (American, British, and French) combined into the Federal Republic of Germany. At all points West Germany was much larger and richer than East Germany, which became a dictatorship under the control of the Communist Party and was closely monitored by Moscow. Germany, especially Berlin, was a cockpit of the Cold War, with NATO and the Warsaw Pact assembling major military forces in west and east. However, there was never any combat.

West Germany enjoyed prolonged economic growth beginning in the early 1950s. Industrial production doubled from 1950 to 1957, and gross national product grew at a rate of 9 or 10% per year, providing the engine for economic growth of all of Western Europe. Labor unions supported the new policies with postponed wage increases, minimized strikes, support for technological modernization, and a policy of co-determination, which involved a satisfactory grievance resolution system as well as requiring representation of workers on the boards of large corporations. The recovery accelerated with the currency reform of June 1948; U.S. gifts of $1.4 billion as part of the Marshall Plan; breaking down of old trade barriers and traditional practices; and the opening of the global market. West Germany gained legitimacy and respect as it shed the horrible reputation Germany had gained under the Nazis.

West Germany played a central role in the creation of European cooperation; it joined NATO in 1955 and was a founding member of the European Economic Community in 1958.

Willy Brandt (1913–1992) was the leader of the Social Democratic Party in 1964–87 and West German Chancellor in 1969–1974. Under his leadership, the German government sought to reduce tensions with the Soviet Union and improve relations with the German Democratic Republic. Relations between the two German states had been icy at best, with propaganda barrages in each direction. The heavy outflow of talent from East Germany prompted the building of the Berlin Wall in 1961, which worsened Cold War tensions and prevented East Germans from travel.

East Germany

In 1949, the Soviet zone became the “Deutsche Demokratische Republik” under control of the Socialist Unity Party. Neither country had a significant army until the 1950s, but East Germany built their Stasi into a powerful secret police that infiltrated every aspect of the society.

East Germany was an Eastern bloc state under political and military control of the Soviet Union through her occupation forces and the Warsaw Treaty. Leading members of the communist-controlled Socialist Unity Party solely executed political power. A Soviet-style command economy was set up; later the GDR became the most advanced Comecon state. While East German propaganda touted benefits of the GDR’s social programs and an alleged constant threat of a West German invasion, many of her citizens yearned for the West’s political freedoms and economic prosperity.

Walter Ulbricht (1893–1973) was the party boss from 1950 to 1971. In 1933, Ulbricht had fled to Moscow, where he served as a Comintern agent loyal to Stalin. As World War II was ending, Stalin assigned him the job of designing the postwar German system that would centralize all power in the Communist Party. Some 2.6 million people had fled East Germany by 1961 when he built the Berlin Wall to stop them — shooting some who attempted it. Ulbricht lost power in 1971, but stayed on as nominal head of state. He was replaced because he failed to solve growing national crises, such as the worsening economy in 1969–70, the fear of another popular uprising as had occurred in 1953, and disgruntlement between Moscow and Berlin caused by Ulbricht’s détente policies toward the West.

The transition to Erich Honecker (General Secretary from 1971 to 1989) led to a change in the direction of national policy and efforts by the Politburo to pay closer attention to the grievances of the proletariat. Honecker’s plans were not successful, however, with dissent growing among East German population.

In 1989, the socialist regime collapsed after 40 years, despite its omnipresent secret police, the Stasi. Main reasons for the collapse included severe economic problems and growing emigration towards the West.

References: Wikipedia

 

Reunited Germany

History of Germany between 1990 and today

This history continues today. Who would like to source and contribute an article to bring us up to date?

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

Energy To Transport To Healthcare, 8 Industries Being Disrupted By Elon Musk And Companies

Source: 8 Industries Being Disrupted By Elon Musk And His Companies | CB Insights Research

Elon Musk thinks and acts on a larger cosmic scales than we are accustomed to seeing entrepreneurs operate. Musk has become a household name synonymous with the future.

Whether he’s working on electric vehicles (Tesla) or sending rockets into space (SpaceX), his larger-than-life reputation attracts its fair share of attention — and scrutiny.

His main projects take on almost every major industry and global problem conceivable, and imagine a disruptive fundamental rewiring of that space or sector.

ELON MUSK’S COMPANIES BY INDUSTRY 

 

Industry 

How it Could Be Disrupted 

SpaceX

Space Launches 

Offering lower priced transport into space 

 

Telecommunications 

Offering lower priced service 

 

Satellite Internet 

Putting more satellites into space for cheaper

Tesla

Automobiles 

Building the best, lowest-cost electric vehicle 

 

Personal Transport 

Eliminating the need for car ownership entirely 

 

Solar Energy 

Increasing access with Powerwall and Solar Roof 

 

Fossil Fuels 

Maximizing efficiency of solar panels

 

Car Sharing 

Making idle Tesla cars available via app 

The Boring Company

Tunneling 

Reducing cost of tunneling through the ground 

 

Infrastructure 

Building more efficient transportation infrastructure 

 

Real Estate 

Increasing range people can live from their place of work

 

Freight Shipping 

Reducing freight costs by a magnitude 

OpenAI

AI/Machine Learning 

Owning the best AI system in the world 

 

Competitive Gaming 

Consistently producing better-than-human AIs 

Neuralink

Prosthetics 

Reducing cost of effective prostheses by magnitude

 

Medicine (Treatment) 

Treating serious illness with simple injection 

 

Military 

Allowing enhancement of human capabilities 

 

Robotics 

Better modeling of brain-machine interaction 

Take a look at the state of his companies and how they are — or aren’t — transforming the industries in which they operate:

  1. Automotive: Tesla has boomed in 2020. We take a look at the company’s rocky history and how Musk has propelled Tesla to become the most highly-valued carmaker in the world.
  2. Aerospace: Find out how SpaceX plans to build a “freeway” to Mars by reducing the cost of flying a spaceship to a fraction of what it is today, and to harness rocket technology for earth travel as well.
  3. Telecommunications: Musk’s work in space could revolutionize how we get online, and provide fast, affordable internet for those without access.
  4. Energy: According to a utilities lobbying group, Musk’s efforts with Tesla and SolarCity could “lay waste to US power utilities and burn the utility business model.”
  5. Transportation: We analyze the Hyperloop, Musk’s proposed “fifth mode of transportation” that’s a “cross between a Concorde and an air hockey table,” and the progress that’s been made.
  6. Infrastructure/Tunneling: We look at how Musk’s business, called The Boring Company, is trying to cut costs in the notoriously expensive tunneling industry, where a mile of tunnel can cost $1B to dig and each additional inch in diameter costs millions more.
  7. AI: We investigate why Musk, who is certain that the race for AI superiority will be the “most likely cause” of WWIII, is investing so much into building better AI.
  8. Healthcare: We dig into the high-bandwidth, minimally invasive brain machine interfaces that Neuralink is developing to create futuristic humans.


Elon Musk’s Companies

Elon Musk is the CEO, founder, inventor, or adviser for some of the world’s most-hyped companies, including:

  • SpaceX (including Starlink) 
  • Tesla (including SolarCity) 
  • The Boring Company 
  • OpenAI 
  • Neuralink 

Read on for a deep dive into how Elon Musk and his companies are transforming vital industries.

1. Automotive

By many counts, Tesla Motors has thrived during the Covid-19 crisis. The company, which has been dogged by missed production targets in the past, remained profitable amid the pandemic despite a factory shutdown, is expanding rapidly with plans to build 2 additional factories in Texas and Germany, and saw its stock price quadruple to make it the world’s most valuable car maker.

WHAT IS TESLA’S MISSION?

Founded in 2003, Tesla is Musk’s second project post-PayPal, and still one of his most ambitious.

Tesla envisions a future of self-driving cars, where the majority of people travel by autonomous Tesla vehicles. It is also a future where car owners seamlessly rent out their vehicles to serve as self-driving cabs while they are not using them. Part of the company’s mission is to ramp up the global transition to sustainable energy.

However, production problems have plagued the California-based company, causing delivery delays and raising concerns from some Tesla shareholders. The enormity of the hype around Tesla has made the company an attractive target for short sellers, but the bets have lost more than $20B this year as Tesla’s stock has more than quadrupled YTD.


Source: Institutional Investor

WHY BET ON ELECTRIC VEHICLES? 

Expecting electric vehicles to become mass market makes sense. Great Britain and France voted to ban diesel and gasoline auto sales starting in the year 2040. China has said that 20% of cars sold in the country should run on some alternative source of fuel by 2025. GM plans to have 20 electric vehicle models on the road by 2023. Volvo is expecting to sell 1M electric cars by 2025.


Bloomberg’s growth forecast for electric vehicles over the next several decades. Source: Bloomberg NEF

In this landscape, owning the electric vehicle market begins to look a lot more like eventually owning the entire automobile industry.

THE PROMISE OF TESLAS

Americans spend an average of nearly $3,000 a year on gasoline. Freight companies pay as much as $200,000 a year to fuel up each semi.

Though electric vehicles like those from Tesla still rely on the grid for energy, they could help reduce that economic burden.


The Tesla Semi will reportedly save drivers up to $200,000 a year on fuel costs.

Another distinguishing point for Tesla is their self-driving technology. (Newsletter covers other corporations working on autonomous vehicle tech here.) 

The vehicles are equipped with 8 external cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and a radar that are used to generate a model of the surrounding environment. Those models are uploaded to Tesla, where they are studied and compared with millions of hours of footage compiled from other Tesla vehicles.

The resulting “Autopilot” technology, available in all 4 Tesla models, enables features like auto steering, self-parking, and summoning. Fully autonomous driving without driver input is not yet available.


A driver uses a smartphone to summon his car during a rainstorm.

However, questions regarding the safety of autonomous driving tech and regulatory approval remain obstacles. For example, Tesla’s Autopilot system was engaged during a fatal crash in 2018. After 3 crashes involving the Autopilot system in early 2021, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration launched an official investigation.

TESLA’S ROCKY HISTORY

The Tesla Model 3 — Tesla’s first true mass market electric vehicle — became the best-selling electric vehicle globally in March 2020.

But getting to that point wasn’t easy.

Within 48 hours of announcing the Model 3 in March 2016, the car had almost 250,000 preorders. That amounted to over $10B in potential sales. But delivering on those orders proved to be a problem.

Musk promised 1,500 Model 3 units in the third quarter of 2017, up to 20,000 per month by December. In reality, he produced only 260 units in the third quarter.

In November 2017, the date for hitting 5,000 Model 3 units a week in production moved from December to March 2018. The company sold about 100,000 vehicles that year. 

Production issues for the Model 3 continued to plague Tesla throughout 2018. The goal of 5,000 cars/week was finally reached in the last week of June, which required Musk to: 

  • Build a tent in 2 weeks to house an entirely new assembly line
  • Stay at the facility “24/7” and work 120-hour work weeks to help solve production bottlenecks
  • Call employees from other business functions to try and speed up production


Source: Statista

However, production has ramped up since then, with Tesla delivering 499,550 vehicles in 2020. The company aims to deliver up to 1M vehicles in 2021, although a global semiconductor shortage may hinder that goal.

TESLA’S RECENT SUCCESS

A number of developments have helped Tesla gain momentum:

  • Less than a year after breaking ground, its China plant hit early production targets for 1,000 Model 3s a week in December 2019. This helped sustain revenue as Tesla’s lone US plant shut down during the pandemic.
  • The company also began work on its third assembly facility in Germany in early 2020.
  • Enthusiasm swelled when the carmaker began delivering its newest Model Y — a compact SUV expected to become a bestseller — ahead of time in March.
  • In July 2020, Tesla Motors announced that it notched its fourth-straight profitable quarter for the first time in its 17-year history. It also revealed plans to build a second US assembly plant in Austin, Texas, slated to build the Cybertruck pickup, which was unveiled in 2019.


Source: WSJ

However, Tesla’s future isn’t necessarily smooth sailing from here on out. Critics have been skeptical about the sustainability of profits in recent quarters, and some analysts are questioning the company’s sky-high valuation. Meanwhile, US tax breaks for purchasing Tesla’s electric vehicles have expired, potentially dampening buyer demand.

Tesla is facing growing pressure in China as well. The Chinese government has reportedly banned Tesla vehicles from entering its military premises, sensitive facilities, and key agencies. The government expressed security concerns over the multiple cameras installed onboard in Tesla cars, fearing that the “data the cars gather could be a source of national security leaks.”

Troubles in China are a major source of concern for Tesla. The company sold 147,445 cars in China in 2020, almost a third of its deliveries. The company also runs Shanghai Gigafactory.

It comes as no surprise that Musk reacted quickly to spying concerns. In March 2021, he said that Tesla has “a very strong incentive” to protect sensitive data because otherwise it risks being shut down. It remains to be seen how Tesla will maintain its position in China amidst a growing tech rivalry between Beijing and Washington.

Another potential source of volatility is Tesla’s foray into cryptocurrencies. The company purchased $1.5B worth of bitcoin in February 2021 and announced it would accept the cryptocurrency as payment.


Musk often encourages people to buy digital coins on Twitter, driving the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. But cryptocurrencies are volatile, and their price drop could cost Tesla billions. The carmaker’s stock is now directly affected by the value of Bitcoin.

Tesla is also considering a move into insurance, a more traditional finance sector. The company briefly offered insurance in 2019 before pausing the program. In July 2020, Musk told investors in an earnings call that Tesla plans to build “a major insurance company.” The new service has yet to roll out despite Musk promising the launch by the end of 2020.

Analysts point out that insurance could help the company improve profit margins and get more value out of its vehicles.

2. Aerospace

Leaving humanity as a single-planet species is a surefire path to extinction, according to Musk.

The further we explore and settle away from Earth, the more resilient our species becomes in the face of threats like superhuman AI or the depletion of Earth’s natural resources.


Source: SpaceX

WHAT IS SPACEX?

In 2002, Musk founded Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, or SpaceX, with the goal of making humanity multiplanetary.

“You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great — and that’s what being a spacefaring civilization is all about,” per a Musk quote on the SpaceX website. “It’s about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And I can’t think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars.”

In the summer of 2020, SpaceX became the first commercial company to send 2 NASA astronauts to the International Space Station and back. The mission also marked the first manned launch from US soil since 2011, when NASA ended its space shuttle program.

CURRENT TECH

High launch costs have been prohibitive to the expansion of space travel. However, typical launch costs have declined by a factor of 20 in the past decade thanks to commercial rocket development.

There are a host of technical reasons for the high costs, including the capital requirements of building single-use rockets, low failure tolerance, and high system complexity.

For Musk, reusable rockets are the key to making space exploration accessible. 

Currently, at the top end of the price spectrum are the “expendable launch systems,” such as Arianespace’s Vega launcher and Boeing/Lockheed Martin Atlas V (manufactured by United Launch Alliance, a joint venture between the 2 companies).


These big rockets can put a lot into orbit, but cannot be reused. The Space Shuttle (NASA) sits in the middle of the cost range. The shuttle was designed to be cheap and reusable, but the price of the expendable solid rocket boosters and main fuel tank added to the cost and ultimately restricted the value of the program.

At the bottom of the spectrum sit SpaceX’s Falcon rockets, which have already shown a decrease in cost of up to 5x for getting a spacecraft into the sky.

In August 2020, SpaceX celebrated its 100th rocket launch as well as a new milestone of reusing a single orbital rocket 6 times.

In the long term, Musk wants SpaceX to put 1M people on Mars by 2050. To do that, he said that the “cost per ton to orbit needs to improve by >1000% from where Falcon is today for there to be a self-sustaining city on Mars.”

WHY DOES ELON MUSK WANT TO GO TO MARS?

Musk has said that humans need to set up a presence on Mars to protect “the continuance of consciousness as we know it.” Mars is not exactly hospitable, but it is one of the better nearby options for humans to settle.


The Martian day is just a bit longer, the temperature range is not too extreme, and the amount of land is similar. There is water under the surface and an abundance of resources that could help to sustain human life.

HOW SPACEX IS WORKING TOWARD MARS

Getting to that cost improvement to make commercial interplanetary space travel a reality requires more than just reusable rockets. That is just the first of 4 envisioned components that are needed to set up a return service to Mars economically:

  • Reuse of rocket technology. This is where SpaceX has found success so far.
  • Refill the rockets in orbit. So much fuel will be needed for a trip to Mars, the rockets may need to refuel in orbit.
  • The ability to produce propellant on Mars. If it’s a challenge to launch with enough fuel to get there, then transporting the fuel to get back would be even more prohibitive.
  • The ability to produce the right type of propellant on Mars.

The SpaceX vehicles will use Methalox, a combination of methane and oxygen. To make the methane, SpaceX will collect carbon dioxide from Mars’ atmosphere (96% of the atmosphere is CO2) and mine water from the surface. Through this, the company can produce all the fuel its needs for the return trip.


The SpaceX plan for shuttling between Earth and Mars includes finding a way to generate enough fuel to sustain a return trip on the red planet itself.

The vehicle won’t be the Falcon rocket/Dragon capsule combination currently in use. Instead, SpaceX is developing Starship (previously named the Big Falcon Rocket). A prototype was successfully launched 500 feet into the air for the first time in early August.

But ensuring that the Starship prototypes land has been a challenge. In April 2021, the fourth Starship prototype in a row failed to land and exploded in midair.


Source: SpaceX

The ambitious vision for Starship outlines a 400-feet tall, 30-feet wide ship, propelled by 37 Raptor engines, which will be capable of transporting up to 100 people at a time.


Source: Ken Kirtland IV

WHAT IS NEXT FOR SPACEX?

Before SpaceX takes anyone to Mars, it plans to bring Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa close to the moon. In September 2018, Musk announced that the Japanese billionaire and his 6-8 guests will be the first humans to see the moon up close since the Apollo 17 astronauts in 1972. Initially slated for 2019, SpaceX has pushed back the trip to concentrate on developing the more powerful Starship, with plans to launch as soon as 2023.

SpaceX also plans to send the world’s first all-civilian mission to space by the end of 2021. Called Inspiration4, the 4-person mission will be led by billionaire Jared Isaacman and will also include Hayley Arceneaux, Christopher Sembroski, and Dr. Sian Proctor. SpaceX will use a Falcon 9 rocket to launch the crew.

The crewmembers will be aboard a Dragon spacecraft that will orbit the Earth along a specific flight. At the end of this mission, the spacecraft will re-enter the atmosphere and hit the ocean off the coast of Florida.


Inspiration4 crew: Christopher Sembroski, Hayley Arceneaux, Dr. Sian Proctor, and Jared Isaacman. Source: Inspiration4

Musk hopes this mission will inspire others to sign up for these flights. And although most people can’t afford space tourism, Musk says that missions like Inspiration4 are like “when America went to the moon in ’69 — it wasn’t just a few people, humanity went to the moon.” As technology progresses, he hopes all-civilian flights will become more affordable.

Musk’s ambitions with SpaceX aren’t just focused on interplanetary travel. The rocket company is using its space-faring experience to build its own internet service, to be delivered by a constellation of thousands of satellites.


3. Telecommunications

For all the talk of Musk’s innovation, his average project seems to revolve around a set formula: find an old idea that failed because of lackluster technology, and attack it with some of the world’s best engineers.

That’s exactly how Musk and SpaceX are going after the $400B satellite internet industry to provide online access to those in rural, hard to reach locations.

WHAT IS STARLINK?

SpaceX’s ambitious $10B Starlink project isn’t intended to provide high-speed internet to everyone, everywhere, but instead targets the population that terrestrial networks have failed to reach.

“I want to be clear: it’s not like Starlink is some huge threat to telcos,” Musk said in a March keynote. “In fact, it will be helpful to telcos because Starlink will serve the hardest-to-serve customers that telcos otherwise have trouble dealing with.”


Source: SpaceX

THE STATE OF SATELLITE INTERNET

The idea of beaming the internet down from satellites is an old one. Teledesic was founded in the early ’90s to build a constellation of satellites that could provide a wide network of broadband internet. It, and a few other similar companies, failed and went bankrupt given the logistical challenge of getting so many satellites into space and maintaining low-latency connections.

There have been a number of prominent satellite internet company flame-outs in the last few decades — Iridium, Teledesic, Globalstar, and OneWeb, to name a few. But the Starlink project differs in some significant ways:

  • Cost: As discussed above, SpaceX has brought (and continues to bring) the cost of launching a satellite down to a fraction of what it once was
  • Speed: Previous satellite internet attempts capped out at about 25 Mbps, while SpaceX is targeting about 1 Gbps
  • Latency: The amount of time it takes for a data packet to travel between Earth and a satellite — current high-orbit providers post about 600+ milliseconds (ms) latency, while SpaceX is aiming at below 20 ms for its low-orbit satellites, a significant improvement

HOW SPACEX IS REVOLUTIONIZING SATELLITE INTERNET WITH STARLINK

Elon Musk first talked publicly about satellite internet in early 2015. In 2018, SpaceX received the go-ahead from the FCC to launch up to 11,943 broadband satellites.


SpaceX plans to deliver global broadband internet from orbit, creating a mesh network that could cover the entire globe.

A few months later, SpaceX flew a used rocket into space for the first time.

SpaceX has already brought the cost of a satellite launch down to about $62M, compared to competitors’ rates that go upwards of $165M. It’s also pioneered reusable rockets, which can bring down the cost to below $30M per launch, according to SpaceX’s director of vehicle integration.

The first 2 Starlink satellites — Tintin A and B — were launched into orbit in February 2018. As of March 2021, Starlink has deployed over 1,000 satellites, surpassing the 800-satellite mark where the network expected to become functional.


Most of the world still doesn’t have access even to a land-locked gigabit internet connection.

WHAT’S NEXT FOR STARLINK?

Two challenges remain for SpaceX:

  1. The FCC requires that half of the satellites be launched by March 2024 — SpaceX had only planned on launching one-third, or 1,600, by that time. Since the FCC is reserving a band of telecommunications spectrum for the Starlink system, it wants SpaceX to fully deploy the satellites as soon as possible.
  2. SpaceX also has to provide an updated “de-orbit plan.” This shows how SpaceX is going to deal with all of the space debris from deteriorating satellites, which, in the worst case scenario, could trigger a chain of devastating satellite collisions. With close to 6,000 tons of material in low Earth orbit as of 2019, the FCC wants to make sure SpaceX isn’t contributing to the problem of space junk.

The FCC also awarded SpaceX with nearly $900M in subsidies to bring internet to rural areas. The subsidies will be paid out over a decade. Participation has traditionally been limited to fixed broadband providers, but recent beta tests have shown that Starlink’s broadband speed clears the low-latency threshold.

In October 2020, SpaceX launched the initial public beta test called the Better Than Nothing Beta program. Users in the US, UK, and Canada can sign up to join the program. To participate, they have to pay $499 for the Starlink ground equipment as well as a $99 monthly service fee.

SpaceX also developed a Starlink mobile app for both Android and Apple devices that helps users manage the equipment. In an email sent to beta testers, the company said that it expects latency “to decrease to between 16ms and 19ms by summer 2021.” SpaceX is pursuing further international expansion, with Austria, Germany, South Africa, Mexico, Japan, and Italy on the list of countries where Starlink service may eventually be available.

Competition for the market is also growing. Apple is reportedly building out a satellite internet team, while Amazon recently gained FCC approval for its $10B Kuiper constellation of 3,236 satellites.

Ultimately, Starlink’s progress has brought momentum into an industry that has been stagnant for decades.

4. Energy

Eliminating our dependence on fossil fuels and instead drawing energy from the “giant fusion reactor in the sky” (i.e. the sun) has been one of Musk’s priorities for more than a decade.

WHAT IS SOLARCITY?

Elon Musk originally suggested the concept for the company that became SolarCity to his cousins, Peter and Lyndon Rive, in 2004.

SolarCity, which creates and sells solar panels and roof tiles, was Musk’s first attempt to make solar power mainstream and ubiquitous. The company was at the forefront of the early 2000’s “solar gold rush.” In some ways it was a failure, but it remains important to understand its trajectory to understand how Musk and Tesla plan to approach renewable energy.

SolarCity grew to become the country’s largest provider of residential solar energy, then suffered some very public financial problems before being purchased by Tesla for $2.6B.

That 2016 acquisition was controversial, with many observers calling it a thinly veiled bailout, and gave rise to a multi-year shareholder lawsuit — with $2.6B in damages at stake — that has yet to be resolved.

WHY SOLAR ENERGY?

The concept for SolarCity emerged out of a simple realization: the clock was running low on fossil fuels. The need for a replacement was emerging fast. “If they started now,” as Men’s Journal reports Musk telling Lyndon in 2004, “They might rule the market.”

Coal production had been in a plateau since the late 1990s, as had electricity generation from nuclear. And while some predicted a “nuclear renaissance” in the early 2000s, as of 2004, that had not arrived either.


Electricity generation from nuclear power has remained fairly steady since 2000 — though growth has all but stopped. Source: EIA

As of 2004, a majority of the generators of nuclear and coal-based power in the US were also starting to reach end-of-life status. They would soon need either expensive upgrades or maintenance, or to be refashioned into generators for alternate sources of energy.


The average nuclear or coal installation lasts about 40 years. Today, about 250 gigawatts of our total energy consumption comes from generators that are in imminent need of upgrade or maintenance or replacement.

At the same time, solar looked like an attractive alternative. Prices on solar power had been dropping for decades, going from about $76/watt in 1977 to less than a dollar per watt in recent years.


The Swanson Effect observes that the price of building photo-voltaic cells for use in solar power generation tends to fall by about 20% every time the volume of solar panels produced doubles. Source: Wikimedia

The price of installing solar panels on roofs decreased as well — and has continued to do so in the ensuing years.


Source: SEIA

SOLARCITY’S HISTORY

SolarCity launched in July 2006 and took on the last-mile challenge of making solar truly accessible and mainstream. By 2013, it was the leading installer of solar systems in residential buildings in the United States.

Its key innovation, though, was less on the technology side and more on the accounting side. Before SolarCity, the cost for getting a solar roof installed was between $30,000 and $50,000 upfront. SolarCity pioneered the “solar lease” strategy, which allows homeowners to get their roofs installed for free and pay back the installation costs over time. GTM Research reports that solar leases made up 72% of new solar installations as of 2014.

February 2014 was SolarCity’s stock price peak. But cancellation rates on SolarCity contracts soon spiked to 45% or more, according to Fast Company.

Some critics pointed to SolarCity’s aggressive sales tactics as the culprit. SolarCity salespeople would book installations using savings promises that critics say “bent the truth” on the numbers. Customers, once they realized they wouldn’t be saving as much as they had been promised, canceled their installations in droves.

All the while, the SolarCity sales team was growing by hundreds of people a week, and they were incentivized to book installations. Revenue, however, was not increasing at nearly the same rate.

Toward the end of 2015, SolarCity promised investors it would right the ship — by reducing its growth rate. Wall Street wearied. After SolarCity announced a particularly bad quarter in February 2016, its stock price dropped by a third.

“This is a company that I regard in a first-class crisis that acts as if everything is fine,” TV anchor Jim Cramer said afterwards. “You know I’m an aficionado of conference calls. You may have found the bottom. Yes, [this is] the worst conference call of 2016.”

In February 2016, Musk proposed that Tesla buy SolarCity.

Tesla was developing the technology to help people charge their Teslas at home and on the road. These so-called Powerwall batteries were being installed in homes and connected to solar generators by third parties.

After the deal was approved, SolarCity’s business became organized under the Tesla “Solar Roof” product offering — allowing Tesla to provide end-to-end residential solar energy rather than just the battery.

WHAT IS TESLA DOING WITH SOLAR ROOF NOW?

At a 2017 National Governors Association meeting in Rhode Island, Elon Musk announced that — with solar technology from SolarCity and battery technology from Tesla Powerwall — a 100 square mile patch of land could provide enough power to supply the entire United States.

But that promise remains to be seen.

Rollout of the Solar Roof has been slow: the first preorders were in May 2017, and the first non-employee installations began in spring 2018.

The earliest results suggested some success. Amanda Tobler’s Solar Roof was one of the first to get hooked up to a local energy provider and to start producing electricity for her family. The full roof cost about $50K (including federal tax credits) for about 2K square feet of roofing, of which 40% were solar tiles.

In the summer, the solar panels started producing higher amounts of electricity, getting to the point where, even with A/C use and 2 electric vehicles charging, Tobler was pumping electricity back into the grid, according to her Twitter account.


In just one week, the solar roof produced 394 kWh of electricity, far more than the average US residential electricity use of ~225 kWh/week.

During this phase, her family used just 2.9kWh from the grid but gave back 101 kWh to other Californians.

Though the technology is promising, Tesla has not been able to roll out the tiles to many buyers.

In Tesla’s Q2’18 earnings call, Musk stated that the company “now [had] several hundred homes with the Solar Roof on them,” though the company later clarified that he included roofs that are scheduled for installment or partially installed.

However, in May 2018, only 12 roofs had been installed and connected to the grid, according to Reuters.

In October 2019, Tesla launched a third iteration of the roof, which the company claimed would be cheaper and easier to install.


Source: Tesla

The launch of this new version also expanded availability to 25 states, up from 8, and solar roof installations have ramped up some: Q2’20 solar roof installations tripled compared to Q1, according to an earnings call.

Further, Musk said in a Q2’20 earnings call that Tesla solar energy costs just $1.49 per watt after the federal tax credit.

Musk also claimed in February 2020 that the product would be expanding to international markets, though global rollout has yet to happen.


DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT BELOW


He later announced that the rollout in Europe and Canada might happen in 2021. Tesla already filed a Solar Roof patent, called “Packaging for Solar Roof Tiles,” with the European Patent Office in June 2020. The company has also optimized Model 3 production, which took many of its resources in previous years. Musk says that means “now we got a little more bandwidth, we’re putting a lot of attention on solar, and it is growing rapidly.”

In Q4 2020, the amount of annual solar energy generation capabilities deployed by Tesla rose to 87 megawatts, up from 54 megawatts in Q4 2019. The company thus quickly recovered from a brief slump in sales caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Tesla will also provide Apple with 85 Megapack battery energy storage systems. The phone maker will use these batteries to store 240 megawatt-hours of energy in its future California-based solar farm. Once built, this facility will power Apple’s headquarters.


Tesla is exploring other revenue streams for its home energy products division as well. Musk said on Twitter that he plans to eventually produce HVAC systems with air filtration capabilities. This move would especially benefit owners of solar roofing products by allowing them to achieve a higher level of off-grid self-sufficiency and get more value out of their Tesla batteries.

TESLA’S ONGOING LEGAL OBSTACLES WITH SOLARCITY

Meanwhile, the company has faced legal struggles.

In August 2019, Walmart sued Tesla after its solar panels caught on fire at 7 of its stores, but quickly reached a settlement a few months later.

Tesla also remains ensnared in a major ongoing lawsuit originally filed in September 2016, right after the SolarCity acquisition.

Tesla shareholders alleged that Musk misrepresented the financial crisis SolarCity was in at the time, and that the $2.6B deal was essentially a bailout for the solar installer. In a June 2019 deposition, Musk admitted that he transferred every solar employee to work on the Model 3 car, which further damaged SolarCity’s shot at revival. After Tesla directors settled for $60M in January 2020, Musk remains the sole defendant in the case and will go to trial in March 2021.

5. Transportation

Transportation by vacuum tube is a centuries-old idea. In 1812, an Englishman named George Medhurst was the first to propose building tunnels underground and shooting passengers in pods through them pneumatically.

In 2012, Elon Musk was one of the first to convince people that this vision could be realized.

WHAT IS THE HYPERLOOP?

Musk first started talking publicly about the Hyperloop in 2012, at a PandoDaily event in Santa Monica.

This “fifth mode of transport” (after cars, planes, trains and boats) would be a “cross between a Concorde and a railgun and an air hockey table.” Riders would travel in a low-pressure tube, inside pod-like capsules supported by air and powered by a “magnetic linear accelerator.”


Musk’s original model of a Hyperloop pod from SpaceX’s 2013 whitepaper on the topic.

In a whitepaper, he worked with the SpaceX and Tesla teams to test the idea’s feasibility and understand its economics. They wrote that a “pod” would be able to travel a distance of 30 miles in just 2.5 minutes, cutting a 6-hour trip to just 30 minutes. And it would only need to cost about $20 USD each way to sustain itself.

According to this projection, it would be cheaper than the high-speed rail California was planning to implement at the time.

The Hyperloop was envisioned as a form of commercial transportation that’s much faster than traditional approaches.

Commercial airlines can move passengers at an average speed of 575 mph. The Hyperloop would travel at about 760 mph.

This is also double the speed of Japan’s planned Maglev bullet train, which set a speed record for trains of 374 mph during its 2015 test run.

WHAT INDUSTRIES COULD HYPERLOOP IMPACT?

The Hyperloop could have a major impact on a few different industries.

For one, the $765B+ airline industry. With the exception of travel over oceans, the Hyperloop could transport passengers faster and for less money than an airplane.

That speed could alter where and how Americans live, dramatically changing both residential and commercial real estate. One could feasibly work in Manhattan and live a 6-hour drive away, in Burlington, Vermont — a 30-minute Hyperloop commute.

It could also revolutionize freight shipping. Almost half of all American import goods flow through the ports at Los Angeles and Long Beach. 14,000 truck drivers bring those goods to warehouses and rail yards all across Southern California, according to SCPR. They move about 11,000 containers a day and burn about 68M gallons of fuel every year, according to PwC.

While you would still need trucks for last-mile delivery, a Hyperloop-like system could transport goods an order of magnitude faster at much lower expense (with far less pollution).

WHO’S WORKING ON THE HYPERLOOP?

Musk has remained largely hands-off in making this vision a reality, but other firms have made progress, including:

  • Virgin Hyperloop One, which is working on hyperloop projects in India as well as the US, and was the first to construct a test track
  • Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HyperloopTT), which has signed deals with China, Ukraine, and France to build hyperloop systems
  • Netherlands-based Hardt Hyperloop, which aims to develop a pilot route by 2023 and operate commercially by 2028
  • Canada-based TransPod, which unveiled plans to build a 3-km test track in France in 2019


Source: Wired

In a landmark move for the industry, the US Department of Transportation issued guidance regarding Hyperloop technology in July, the first government agency to do so. The framework placed Hyperloop proposals under the jurisdiction of the Federal Railroad Administration, making future projects eligible for railway grants.

Critics of Hyperloop technology highlight the difficulty of achieving the right-of-way to build a train above-ground as well as the cost of construction, which has stymied high-speed rail projects for decades.

And tunneling technology isn’t there yet.

These challenges haven’t prevented Virgin Hyperloop from running its first-ever trial with passengers in November 2020. Its director of customer experience, Sara Luchian, and chief technology officer, Josh Giegel, traveled in a futuristic pod 500 meters along a test track in the desert of Nevada.

The pod covered this distance in 15 seconds, reaching the speed of 107mph (172km/h). The company hopes that its pods will eventually achieve travel speeds of over 1,000km/h. But reaching that speed will require traveling at longer distances and enabling pods to properly accelerate.

6. Infrastructure/Tunneling

One day, when Musk was sitting in traffic outside LA, he tweeted out a complaint that became the impetus for the company that would attack this problem head-on.

“Traffic is driving me nuts. Am going to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging…” he tweeted in December 2016.

WHAT IS THE BORING COMPANY?

And so started The Boring Company (TBC), Musk’s solution to “soul-destroying traffic.” The company aims to “construct safe, fast-to-dig, and low-cost transportation, utility, and freight tunnels.”


Source: The Boring Company

CURRENT TECH

The major problem with tunneling is cost.

The cost of tunneling typically ranges between $100M up to $1B/mile. TBC said it has reduced this to $10M per mile.

Reducing cost comes down to 2 things: size and speed.

The cost of a tunnel is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the tunnel. The wider the tunnel you want, the more you have to pay for it. The NYC Second Avenue Subway tunnel is 23.5 feet wide. A one-lane road tunnel has to be 28 feet. The two-lane A-86 West tunnel in Paris, completed in 2011, is 38 feet wide.


The Boring Company intends to build tunnels of just 14 feet. This is half the diameter of the current required road tunnel, and leads to approximately one-fourth of the cross-sectional area. Reducing the diameter can save millions of dollars.

The majority of space in traditional tunnels is for the ventilation of the fumes from combustion engines. The Boring Company’s tunnels look much slimmer because they were originally designed to jettison electric cars on skates, catapulting them through the tunnel network at speeds up to 150 mph.

Whether this vision will come to fruition is unclear: Musk tweeted in May 2019 that he had abandoned the electric skate idea. Instead, the electric vehicles would simply travel autonomously on their own through the tunnel, which some have said undermines the revolutionary public transport concept that was initially promoted.

The other problem is speed. Tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are slow — typically only digging 1 mile of tunnel in 8 to 12 weeks. Musk’s company said its boring machines will aim to tunnel at least 1 mile per week.

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS

Musk is also looking to offset the environmental impact of The Boring Company through one of its main assets: dirt.

Boring Bricks will reuse the dirt from tunneling — each one will cost 10 cents or will be free for affordable housing projects.


Source: The Boring Company

Recycling waste into building materials could reduce the emissions derived from traditional concrete builds, furthering Musk’s vision for a cleaner planet.

WHAT IS THE BORING COMPANY WORKING ON?

Currently, the Boring Company has 4 projects in varying degrees of completion. The first is the test tunnel at SpaceX in Hawthorne, California, built solely for R&D, which was completed in December 2018.


Source: The Boring Company

The second project is the Boring Company’s first paying contract. The Las Vegas Convention Center loop is a 0.8 mile network that would transport convention attendees across the center in modified Teslas. It would reportedly shorten a 20-minute walk to a 1-minute ride.

Excavation of the second of 2 tunnels was completed in May and the completed loop was scheduled to debut in January 2021 at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES). However, because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the event was moved online. The pods were not going to be operated autonomously for the event anyway, according to Las Vegas Convention Center President and CEO Steve Hill.

Still, two more Vegas casinos, the Wynn Resort and Resorts World, have already submitted proposals for additional tunnels connecting the LVCC loop to their resorts.The Boring Company envisions expanding the loop to reach the McCarran International Airport, Allegiant Stadium, downtown Vegas, and eventually, Los Angeles.

However, the $50M project has changed significantly since its contract approval.

Initial designs mapped out a vision of platooned 16-passenger trams that would travel at speeds up to 155 mph. Recent renderings from July 2020 show Tesla Model 3 sedans, which can fit roughly 5 people.

When asked about boosting capacity, Musk replied, “Individualized mass transit is the future.”


Source: The Boring Company

Other Boring Company projects have also faced challenges.

A project called the Dugout Loop, announced in 2018, aims to ferry passengers from East Hollywood to Dodger Stadium in less than 4 minutes. However, the project remains under review by the city of Los Angeles’ Bureau of Engineering, which reportedly aims to present an environmental impact report this fall.

Also in 2018, the Boring Company was selected for a Chicago high-speed train bid, after Musk promised that he could build an 18-mile loop that would connect downtown Chicago to the O’Hare Airport in just 12 minutes using $1B of his own money and no public subsidies.

Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot has yet to advance that bid and appears unlikely to. Lightfoot previously said in an interview with the Sun Times: “The notion that he could do this without any city money is a total fantasy. And in thinking about what our transportation needs are, I’m not sure that an express train to O’Hare in the current proposal rises to the top of our list.” The Chicago Express plan has also been taken off the projects page of the Boring Company website.

Finally, the Boring Co’s East Coast loop, which would connect Washington DC to Baltimore, also remains under review. An environmental report revealed the project to be similar to the Vegas contract — i.e., twin tunnels for electric vehicles — a far cry from its initial hyperloop proposal. Virginia’s chief of rail transportation called it “a car in a very small tunnel.”


Source: The Boring Company

Critics have pointed out issues with Musk and the Boring Co’s lofty promises, with some lambasting that these ideas as ranging from the reinvention of the subway to private tunnels for Tesla owners. Furthermore, some transportation solution advocates warn that providing more space for cars may not actually fix traffic congestion, as the approach may simply incentivize more people to drive while diverting resources from mass transit approaches like subways.

WHAT’S NEXT FOR THE BORING COMPANY?

For Musk, the Boring Company almost comes across as a hobby, as he said in 2018 it takes up just 2-3% of his time. But the Boring Company’s advancements could be helpful to his other projects.

The first is Tesla. The cost projections for the inner city tunnels are lower because they will be exclusively for electric vehicles, reducing the need for ventilation and boosting speed. Proponents say that this could alleviate traffic congestion on the surface streets by transferring traffic underground. When the first tunnels hit capacity, the company plans to add more, creating a network of tunnels under each city.


The second is Hyperloop. These tunnels will have to be larger, but with the advancements learned through the smaller tunneling projects, the Boring Company may be able to increase the efficiency of digging these as well.

The third is SpaceX.

Musk aims to put 1M people on Mars, and tunnels are central to this vision. With inhospitable conditions, humans may need to live underground. If Musk is going to build a colony on Mars, building a network of tunnels could be essential.


7. AI

OpenAI garnered headlines in July 2020 when it released GPT-3, the most powerful language model to date. Trained on 175B parameters — its predecessor, GPT-2, was trained with just 1.5B — the model is sometimes described as a super-smart autocomplete program.

But its capabilities run far beyond autocompleting text: it’s been used to generate short stories, guitar tabs, technical manuals, images, and even computer code.


OpenAI’s GPT-2 model can be used to automatically complete images. Source: OpenAI

Some call GPT-3 a huge step forward for AI given the program’s impressive facility for unsupervised learning, i.e. picking up patterns from unlabeled, unstructured data. But others argue that its capabilities should serve as a warning — what’s to stop such a system from “building up a model of the world and knowledge of everything in it,” per independent researcher Gwern Branwen.

WHAT IS OPENAI?

Elon Musk has long been vocal about the dangers of AI, donating $10M to the Future of Life Institute in 2015 to run a global AI research program. That year, he founded OpenAI with the intent of strengthening AI research.

However, Musk stepped down from the company’s board in 2018 and has said that he is no longer involved closely with OpenAI, citing a need to focus on his other ventures and potential conflicts of interest with Tesla’s AI ambitions.

Current AI research is largely concentrated within big tech companies that have a commercial imperative to keep developments secret. In contrast, OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit to conduct AI research without commercial considerations — though in 2019 it moved to a “capped-profit” organizational structure to help attract investment.

WHY IS AI A THREAT?

AI research is progressing at a significant rate, and Musk sees this as an existential threat to humanity. GoogleFacebook, Amazon, Apple, and an ocean of startups are contributing to the upside of AI: higher efficiency, higher productivity, less work for humans, and, ideally, a higher quality of life for humans.

But the race for these upsides is also a race towards a massive potential downside — a super-intelligent general artificial intelligence that is vastly smarter than humans and sees no use in keeping them around.

Fears about AI are two-fold:

  1. An AI will unintentionally do harmful things
  2. An AI will intentionally do harmful things

The first could be a problem even with current deployments of AI, but more advanced iterations could end up trying to “solve” problems using perverse logic.

Say we build an AI cleaning bot. All this bot wants to do is make sure the world is as clean as can be. If the bot just wants to make sure everything is clean, it has a few options. One option is to just clean up all the mess. This is the outcome we want and that the AI developer is expecting.

But that isn’t the only option. Another possibility is that it will try and stop the mess occurring in the first place. Humans cause mess. “If there are no humans, there is no mess, so let’s get rid of all humans” increases the AI’s utility function and is a perfectly legitimate solution to the AI’s problem.

In 2016, the OpenAI co-authored a research paper titled Concrete Problems in AI Safety. The paper identified 5 areas of research that AI researchers need to strongly consider as they push forward with any type of AI:

  • Avoid negative side effects. How can we make sure that an AI won’t follow its programming such that it will do anything to perform its function? For the cleaning robot, this could be destroying the room in an effort to clean faster.
  • Avoid reward hacking. If the AI uses a reward function to determine the right course of action, how can we make sure it doesn’t just try and maximize that reward function without performing the action? For the cleaning AI, this could include switching off its visual system so it can’t see the mess.
  • Scalable oversight. How can we make sure that an AI can train safely even when training examples are infrequent? The cleaning robot would know that it should clean up coffee cups, but how does it learn not to “clean up” the phone that’s been left overnight on the desk?
  • Safe exploration. Can the AI explore possible outcomes and train without serious repercussions — say, learning how to mop the floor without trying to mop an electrical outlet?
  • Robustness to distributional shift. As the data or environment changes, can the AI continue to perform optimally, or at least define its ambiguity and “fail gracefully”? Can the cleaning AI adapt to cleaning a factory floor if it learned to clean in an office?

There are already ways to test the limits of AI. Robustness is a particular concern for narrow AI. How well do they work when you test them outside of their comfort zone. As of today, not well. Image recognition machine learning systems often misclassify “adversarial” examples — images that have specific noise injected into them to confuse algorithms.


This is a benign example. It’s not hard to imagine a malicious implementation of this approach, however. Imagine an adversarial attack on the AI in your self-driving car that changes its recognition of “stop sign” into “green light” in its programming. Not only would it potentially be as deadly as something like cutting the brake lines in someone’s car, but, depending on the vulnerability the malware exploited, it may also be highly scalable across different vehicles.

HOW IS OPENAI TACKLING THE ISSUE?

OpenAI’s stated mission is to “ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) — by which we mean highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work — benefits all of humanity.”

One of the core concerns is the learning rate for AI. OpenAI Five — an AI that learned to play a multiplayer video game called Dota 2 — played the equivalent of 45,000 years of Dota 2 against itself over a time span of 10 months.


This graph measures OpenAI’s best bot’s TrueSkill rating — similar to an ELO rating in chess — which is a summary of the bot’s win ratios against the other OpenAI bots it trained against. Source: OpenAI

In April 2019, OpenAI Five became the first AI system to defeat Dota 2 world champions OG in an e-sports game, according to a research paper OpenAI published. It went on to win 99.4% of all games played in a public experiment that let anyone play the AI.

OpenAI Five demonstrates the potential for deep reinforcement learning, as the model learned by playing games against itself at an astonishing speed.

It also served as a reminder of the law of accelerating returns: AI that learns quicker is being developed quicker. An artificial general intelligence (AGI) could test millions of iterations of itself, picking the best parameters from each, combining them and immediately becoming smarter. That smarter AGI could then start the process anew.

“I don’t believe in comparing OpenAI Five to human performance, since it’s like comparing the strength we have to hydraulics,” said Johan Sundstein, captain of OG, the first 2-time Dota 2 world champion team. 

OpenAI researchers reported another breakthrough in March 2021. They had found a way to peek into neural networks and gain insights into how the software operates. The team, led by research scientist Gabriel Goh, discovered that neurons — nodes through which data in neural networks flows — are associated with specific concepts. For example, OpenAI found a neuron that’s activated when AI is fed with the image of gold, while another neuron activates in response to images of spiders.

The team also demonstrated how the latest discovery could help uncover hidden biases. Researchers found a “Middle East” neuron that is triggered by images and words associated with this region. But the neuron is also fired with images associated with terrorism.

Another, called an “immigration” neuron, responds to words and images associated with Latin America. There was also a neuron that activated for both gorillas and dark-skinned people, OpenAI said. Discovering these neurons is the first step in finding and removing biases in “black box” algorithms.

OpenAI also trained software called DALL-E to generate images from short text captions. The algorithm was fed with a dataset of over 12B images found on the internet. DALL-E is unique compared to other neural networks because of its ability to produce coherent illustrations using nothing but text inputs.

OpenAI’s co-founder Sam Altman is confident that advances in AI will have positive effects. Just like Musk argued that automation will lead to a universal basic income of some kind, Altman says that the wealth generated by AI should be taxed and distributed to citizens. He estimates that AI will generate so much wealth that “a decade from now each of the 250 million adults in America would get about $13,500 every year.” Altman calls for the government to work on plans that would enable a fair distribution of AI-generated wealth.

With OpenAI, one of Musk’s goals was to make the public sufficiently aware of the threat that AI could represent so that it becomes more likely to be regulated and controlled proactively. OpenAI isn’t, however, the only iron Musk has in this fire. He’s also investing in a hedge against the bet that humanity will save itself from AI in time.

It’s called Neuralink — and the idea is to digitally augment humans before we get replaced.

As Musk once tweeted, “If you can’t beat em, join em.”

8. Healthcare

Most of Musk’s endeavors exist on a big scale: spaceships to Mars, tunnels from DC to New York, electric car-producing factories all across the globe.

Neuralink, however, focuses on the microscopic level.

WHAT IS NEURALINK?

Launched in 2016, Neuralink is Musk’s project to build a brain-computer interface (BCI) that will link human brains directly to computers. Per a Wall Street Journal article,

“Building a mass-market electric vehicle and colonizing Mars aren’t ambitious enough for Elon Musk. The billionaire entrepreneur now wants to merge computers with human brains to help people keep up with machines.”

In a recent product update, Musk described it as a “Fitbit in your skull, with tiny wires.”


Source: Neuralink

WHY BCI?

For Musk, this is the only way the human race will survive given the ongoing encroachment of AI.

As Musk sees it, AI advancement is driven by competition. Companies like Amazon need to invest millions into developing AI because if it doesn’t, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook will, and so on. As a result, the creation of AI that will leave regular humans in the dust seems inevitable.

“Even in the [most] benign scenario,” Musk says, “We would be pets.”

The worst-case scenario would be the complete end of mankind.

With Neuralink, the goal is to augment the human level of intelligence and preemptively mesh us with the digital world so we can build ourselves up before an AI can surpass us.

CURRENT TECH

Musk sees BCIs as the way to bridge the gap and fuse humans with computers. BCIs are brain implants, usually a chip of electrodes a few millimeters square, that are surgically implanted directly into the brain.


Source: Neuralink

The electrodes pick up the electrical activity from brain cells, neurons, and transmit them to a computer. While the brain activity is being recorded, the participant performs a task such as moving a joystick to guide a cursor around on the screen.

The scientists can then use algorithms to correlate the brain activity to the movement, teaching a computer that when certain neurons fire, the cursor should move left. Then you can turn the joystick off and move the cursor purely through brain activity. 

The driving force behind BCIs in the past decade has been the military. As the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) became widespread in Afghanistan and Iraq, limb loss became more common among soldiers. Body armor improved, meaning soldiers were less likely to die in the blast, but extremities weren’t protected. From 2000 to 2015, approximately 1,600 soldiers had amputations.

Helping these soldiers was the goal of DARPA’s Revolutionizing Prosthetics program. Funding was given to research groups around the US with specialties in neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and robotics to develop new implants, new prosthetics, and new understandings of how to control the latter with the former.

Though BCIs have existed in research for decades, major technical challenges remain: 

  • The invasiveness of the interface is high. The implant requires neurosurgery and a constant, hardwired link into the brain. 
  • The bandwidth of the systems is low. We have billions of neurons but BCIs only record a few neurons at any given time. This makes using them for any high-fidelity system difficult. 

The most immediate problem with these BCIs is how to implant them.

Non-invasive BCIs exist, but have low bandwidth as they can’t discern the individual neuronal activity needed for close robotic control.

Wireless BCIs are a compelling approach, but they present their own problems:

  • How do you get power to the device? Wireless radios are power-hungry and processing and sending high-bandwidth information will also require significant power.
  • How do you dissipate heat from the device? Chips, radios, and batteries all produce heat. The brain can only heat up by a degree or so before damage occurs.

Additionally, the electrodes themselves cause damage as they are inserted. The brain’s natural defenses encapsulate them over time, cutting them off from the rest of the brain and rendering them useless.

Once implanted, the question of extracting, decoding, and processing data remains.

There are about 86B neurons in the human brain. As of 2017, the record for the most neurons recorded simultaneously was approximately 700.


Source: MIT Technology Review

Only a fraction of all possible information is extracted by current BCIs. Millions of neurons are involved in the decision and movement when you move your arm to pick up a cup of coffee. To allow an amputee with a prosthetic limb the same degree of control as they had with their original limb requires the ability to record from significantly more neurons at one time.

Once a human is hooked up to a BCI, a learning phase starts. The person learns how to control the robotic arm with the limited bandwidth. The algorithms learn which neurons are signals and which are noise and get better at processing the information. The two symbiotically adjust until the person incorporates their new “arm.”

Another challenge is that scientists simply don’t understand how the brain works. Neuroscientist Christof Koch says that “we do not understand how large-scale neural activity is organized to give rise to thoughts, percepts, consciousness and actions.”

On top of that, it takes decades for techniques tested on laboratory animals to be deployed in clinical trials. Legal, regulatory, and medical approvals take a lot of time. There is also a real danger that brain implants could get hacked by cyber criminals, which would lead to a whole new set of problems.

However, decades of research in this field by lab researchers have already shown stunning progress, allowing people with paralysis to walk again without surgery, enabling people to control robotic prosthetics with their minds, and treating depression by manipulating neural signals.

NEURALINK’S PROGRESS

In late August 2020, Musk unveiled Neuralink’s latest brain implant prototype as well as a new version of its surgical robot in a livestream.

Neuralink’s sewing machine robot will thread ultra-thin electrodes — what Musk terms “neural lace” — through brains to measure the brain’s electrical signals, which represent memories, movements, thoughts, and more. The threads will be connected to a wearable device that collects and transmits the recorded signals, a new prototype of which was also unveiled during the livestream.


Source: Woke Studio

While the initial design of the “Link” featured a credit card-sized wearable designed to go behind the ear, the latest version is coin-sized and would replace a chunk of the skull, sitting flush with its surroundings and rendered invisible when covered by hair.


Source: Neuralink

The Link is novel in packing 1,000+ channels onto its interface, on par with the state-of-the-art Neuropixel, which has 960 channels. Furthermore, the Link device boasted onboard processing that is reportedly 15x better than current systems used in humans. Current neural spike processing is typically recorded offline and processed via computers, but Neuralink’s team was able to develop algorithms to process, filter, and transmit data in a much more efficient way.

Also revealed were 3 pigs that are subjects of Neuralink’s experiments. One pig, which had been implanted with a Link, had her real-time brain activity broadcast on a large screen. Another had successfully had the device implanted and removed.


Source: Neuralink

Musk has said that human trials could be launched by the end of 2021. Neuralink is communicating with the FDA regarding the implant’s safety. He also revealed to Clubhouse users that Neuralink successfully implanted a chip into a monkey’s brain, and the animal was able to play video games using its mind.


POTENTIAL OF NEURALINK

While the future of full AI symbiosis is far off, Neuralink’s more near-term potential is in medical applications, specifically neurological diseases or injuries — a mission current research labs are already working on.

The FDA granted Neuralink a breakthrough device designation in July, according to Musk, and is working with the company to run trials for patients with quadriplegia — paralysis of all 4 limbs.

Neuralink’s device could help people suffering from stroke, neurodegeneration, cancer, spinal cord injuries, amputations, and dozens of other healthcare issues. And if the Neuralink project is successful, years of expensive treatment and therapy (and in many cases risky surgeries) could be replaced with a relatively simple microscopic brain implant that restores motor, memory, or other cognitive functions.

During the August demo, Musk acknowledged the long path ahead before a commercial product is available, but underscored the importance of the “overall aim” of the company.

“On a species level, it’s important to figure out how we coexist with advanced AI, achieving some AI symbiosis,” according to Musk, “such that the future of the world is controlled by the combined will of the people of the earth. That might be the most important thing that a device like this achieves.”

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

Lift Every Voice

“Sing a song full of the faith that the
dark past has taught us,


Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us;

Facing the rising sun of our new day begun,

Let us march on till victory is won.”

 

Every morning the sunrise upon us marks another revolution of our globe basking in the genial glow that flows out in every possible direction.

Thank our mind-bogglingly harsh and gentle parent suns, may grace abound to/from our mother earth, peace and love to all inhabitants whom this bounty share!

When peace and love reigns convincingly on this planet, all beings will be free to contemplate their all-too-restricted journeying across its surface and each contribution made to the ultimate fabric of our shared conceptual reality. We are the universe and it is we.

Set your joy upon these thoughts!

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

Proposed replacement for the thirteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution

  1. Current text of the thirteenth amendment:

NEITHER SLAVERY NOR INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE, EXCEPT AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME WHEREOF THE PARTY SHALL HAVE BEEN DULY CONVICTED, SHALL EXIST WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, OR ANY PLACE SUBJECT TO THEIR JURISDICTION.

  1. Proposed text of a replacement for the thirteenth amendment:

NO INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE, EXCEPT AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME WHEREOF THE PARTY SHALL HAVE BEEN DULY CONVICTED, SHALL EXIST, NEITHER SHALL SLAVERY EXIST WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, OR ANY PLACE SUBJECT TO THEIR JURISDICTION.

Discuss, please.


Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

World’s Most Economically Powerful Mega-Regions

  • Boston-Washington, which extends from Boston through New York and Philadelphia down to Washington, D.C., is the world’s largest mega-region of nearly 50 million people, generating almost $4 trillion in economic output.  If this mega-region were its own country, the economy would be equivalent to the world’s seventh largest, bigger than the United Kingdom’s or Brazil’s.

     

  • Paris-Amsterdam-Munich: Coming in second, this European mega-region spans Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, and Munich. Home to 44 million people, it generates $2.5 trillion in economic output, about as much as Mexico does and more than Italy, equivalent to the world’s sixth largest economy.

     

  • Chicago-Pittsburgh: In third place is this great heartland mega-region that runs through Minneapolis, Chicago, Indianapolis, Detroit, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh, encompassing 50 metros large and small, in total. With a population of more than 30 million people, this mega-region produces more than $2 trillion in economic output, comparable to South Korea’s, making it roughly the 14th largest economy in the world.

     

  • Greater Tokyo is Asia’s largest mega-region, generating just under $2 trillion in economic output and home to almost 40 million people. Its economy is comparable to Spain’s and larger than Canada’s. It would rank as the world’s 11th largest economy if it were a country of its own.

     

  • SoCal, running from Los Angeles to San Diego, is home to more than 20 million people and produces nearly $1.5 trillion in economic output, comparable to the economic output of Australia, and among the world’s 20 leading economies.

     

  • Seoul-San is the world’s 19th largest mega-region. Running from Seoul to Busan, it is home to the 36th largest economy in the world.

     

  • The Texas Triangle spans Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio as well as Austin. It generates $1.2 trillion in economic output while housing just under 20 million people. It would rank as one of the world’s top 25 economies.

     

  • Beijing-Tianjin is China’s largest mega-region. With nearly 40 million residents, it also produces $1.2 trillion in economic output, putting it, too, among the list of the 25 largest economies in the world.

     

  • London-Leeds-Manchester: This mega-region which runs from London through Leeds, and Manchester also generates $1.2 trillion in economic output while housing more than 20 million people. It too makes the list of the world’s top 25 economies.

     

  • HongKong-Shenzhen combines Hong Kong and Shenzhen, home to 20 million people. The region creates slightly over $1 trillion in economic output, equivalent to the 26th largest economy in the world.

     

  • BayArea or NorCal consists of San Francisco, San Jose, and other Bay Area cities. With more than 10 million residents, it generates almost $1 trillion in economic output, making it the world’s 27th largest economy.

     

  • Shanghai-Hangzhou: Spanning Shanghai and Hangzhou, this mega-region is home to nearly 25 million people and produces nearly $900 billion in economic output, placing it among the top 30 economies in the world.

     

     

    Ranking by economic output:

    Mega-Region

    Cities

    Population (millions)

    Economic Output (billions)

    PerCapita

    Bos-Wash

    New York; Washington, D.C.; Boston

    47.6

    $ 3,650.00

    $ 76,680.67

    Par-Am-Mun

    Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Munich

    43.5

    $ 2,505.00

    $ 57,586.21

    Chi-Pitts

    Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh

    32.9

    $ 2,130.00

    $ 64,741.64

    Greater Tokyo

    Tokyo

    39

    $ 1,800.00

    $ 46,035.81

    SoCal

    Los Angeles, San Diego

    22

    $ 1,424.00

    $ 64,727.27

    Seoul-San

    Seoul, Busan

    36

    $ 1,325.00

    $ 37,323.94

    Texas Triangle

    Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Austin

    18.4

    $ 1,227.00

    $ 66,684.78

    Beijing

    Beijing, Tianjin

    37

    $ 1,226.00

    $ 32,780.75

    London-Man

    London, Leeds, Manchester

    23

    $ 1,177.00

    $ 52,079.65

    Hong-Shen

    Hong Kong, Shenzhen

    20

    $ 1,043.00

    $ 53,487.18

    NorCal

    San Francisco, San Jose

    11

    $ 925.00

    $ 85,648.15

    Shanghai

    Shanghai, Hangzhou

    24

    $ 892.00

    $ 36,859.50

    Taipei

    Taipei

    17

    $ 827.00

    $ 49,520.96

    São Paolo

    São Paolo

    34

    $ 780.00

    $ 23,283.58

    Char-Lanta

    Charlotte, Atlanta

    11

    $ 656.00

    $ 62,476.19

    Cascadia

    Seattle, Portland

    9

    $ 627.00

    $ 71,250.00

    Ista-Burs

    Istanbul, Bursa

    15

    $ 626.00

    $ 42,297.30

    Vienna-Budapest

    Vienna, Budapest

    13

    $ 555.00

    $ 43,359.38

    Mexico City

    Mexico City

    25

    $ 524.00

    $ 21,387.76

    Rome-Mil-Tur

    Rome, Milan, Turin

    14

    $ 513.00

    $ 37,173.91

    Singa-Lumpur

    Singapore, Kuala Lumpur

    13

    $ 493.00

    $ 38,818.90

    Cairo-Aviv

    Cairo, Tel Aviv

    20

    $ 472.00

    $ 23,838.38

    So-Flo

    Miami, Tampa

    9

    $ 470.00

    $ 51,648.35

    Abu-Dubai

    Abu Dhabi, Dubai

    5

    $ 431.00

    $ 86,200.00

    Osaka-Nagoya

    Osaka, Nagoya

    9

    $ 424.00

    $ 46,593.41

    Tor-Buff-Chester

    Toronto, Buffalo, Rochester

    8.5

    $ 424.00

    $ 49,882.35

    Delhi-Lahore

    New Delhi, Lahore

    28

    $ 417.00

    $ 14,946.24

    Barcelona-Lyon

    Barcelona, Lyon

    7

    $ 323.00

    $ 46,142.86

    Shandong

    Jinan, Zibo, Dongying

    14

    $ 249.00

    $ 17,535.21

     

    Another ranking, by people working together:

    Mega-Region

    Cities

    Population (millions)

    Economic Output (billions)

    PerCapita

    Bos-Wash

    New York; Washington, D.C.; Boston

    47.6

    $ 3,650.00

    $ 76,680.67

    Par-Am-Mun

    Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Munich

    43.5

    $ 2,505.00

    $ 57,586.21

    Greater Tokyo

    Tokyo

    39

    $ 1,800.00

    $ 46,035.81

    Beijing

    Beijing, Tianjin

    37

    $ 1,226.00

    $ 32,780.75

    Seoul-San

    Seoul, Busan

    36

    $ 1,325.00

    $ 37,323.94

    São Paolo

    São Paolo

    34

    $ 780.00

    $ 23,283.58

    Chi-Pitts

    Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh

    32.9

    $ 2,130.00

    $ 64,741.64

    Delhi-Lahore

    New Delhi, Lahore

    28

    $ 417.00

    $ 14,946.24

    Mexico City

    Mexico City

    25

    $ 524.00

    $ 21,387.76

    Shanghai

    Shanghai, Hangzhou

    24

    $ 892.00

    $ 36,859.50

    London-Man

    London, Leeds, Manchester

    23

    $ 1,177.00

    $ 52,079.65

    SoCal

    Los Angeles, San Diego

    22

    $ 1,424.00

    $ 64,727.27

    Cairo-Aviv

    Cairo, Tel Aviv

    20

    $ 472.00

    $ 23,838.38

    Hong-Shen

    Hong Kong, Shenzhen

    20

    $ 1,043.00

    $ 53,487.18

    Texas Triangle

    Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Austin

    18.4

    $ 1,227.00

    $ 66,684.78

    Taipei

    Taipei

    17

    $ 827.00

    $ 49,520.96

    Ista-Burs

    Istanbul, Bursa

    15

    $ 626.00

    $ 42,297.30

    Shandong

    Jinan, Zibo, Dongying

    14

    $ 249.00

    $ 17,535.21

    Rome-Mil-Tur

    Rome, Milan, Turin

    14

    $ 513.00

    $ 37,173.91

    Vienna-Budapest

    Vienna, Budapest

    13

    $ 555.00

    $ 43,359.38

    Singa-Lumpur

    Singapore, Kuala Lumpur

    13

    $ 493.00

    $ 38,818.90

    NorCal

    San Francisco, San Jose

    11

    $ 925.00

    $ 85,648.15

    Char-Lanta

    Charlotte, Atlanta

    11

    $ 656.00

    $ 62,476.19

    So-Flo

    Miami, Tampa

    9

    $ 470.00

    $ 51,648.35

    Osaka-Nagoya

    Osaka, Nagoya

    9

    $ 424.00

    $ 46,593.41

    Cascadia

    Seattle, Portland

    9

    $ 627.00

    $ 71,250.00

    Tor-Buff-Chester

    Toronto, Buffalo, Rochester

    8.5

    $ 424.00

    $ 49,882.35

    Barcelona-Lyon

    Barcelona, Lyon

    7

    $ 323.00

    $ 46,142.86

    Abu-Dubai

    Abu Dhabi, Dubai

    5

    $ 431.00

    $ 86,200.00

     

     

    And finally, another ranking by per-capita output:

    Mega-Region

    Cities

    Population (millions)

    Economic Output (billions)

    PerCapita

    Abu-Dubai

    Abu Dhabi, Dubai

    5

    $ 431.00

    $ 86,200.00

    NorCal

    San Francisco, San Jose

    11

    $ 925.00

    $ 85,648.15

    Bos-Wash

    New York; Washington, D.C.; Boston

    47.6

    $ 3,650.00

    $ 76,680.67

    Cascadia

    Seattle, Portland

    9

    $ 627.00

    $ 71,250.00

    Texas Triangle

    Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Austin

    18.4

    $ 1,227.00

    $ 66,684.78

    Chi-Pitts

    Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh

    32.9

    $ 2,130.00

    $ 64,741.64

    SoCal

    Los Angeles, San Diego

    22

    $ 1,424.00

    $ 64,727.27

    Char-Lanta

    Charlotte, Atlanta

    11

    $ 656.00

    $ 62,476.19

    Par-Am-Mun

    Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Munich

    43.5

    $ 2,505.00

    $ 57,586.21

    Hong-Shen

    Hong Kong, Shenzhen

    20

    $ 1,043.00

    $ 53,487.18

    London-Man

    London, Leeds, Manchester

    23

    $ 1,177.00

    $ 52,079.65

    So-Flo

    Miami, Tampa

    9

    $ 470.00

    $ 51,648.35

    Tor-Buff-Chester

    Toronto, Buffalo, Rochester

    8.5

    $ 424.00

    $ 49,882.35

    Taipei

    Taipei

    17

    $ 827.00

    $ 49,520.96

    Osaka-Nagoya

    Osaka, Nagoya

    9

    $ 424.00

    $ 46,593.41

    Barcelona-Lyon

    Barcelona, Lyon

    7

    $ 323.00

    $ 46,142.86

    Greater Tokyo

    Tokyo

    39

    $ 1,800.00

    $ 46,035.81

    Vienna-Budapest

    Vienna, Budapest

    13

    $ 555.00

    $ 43,359.38

    Ista-Burs

    Istanbul, Bursa

    15

    $ 626.00

    $ 42,297.30

    Singa-Lumpur

    Singapore, Kuala Lumpur

    13

    $ 493.00

    $ 38,818.90

    Seoul-San

    Seoul, Busan

    36

    $ 1,325.00

    $ 37,323.94

    Rome-Mil-Tur

    Rome, Milan, Turin

    14

    $ 513.00

    $ 37,173.91

    Shanghai

    Shanghai, Hangzhou

    24

    $ 892.00

    $ 36,859.50

    Beijing

    Beijing, Tianjin

    37

    $ 1,226.00

    $ 32,780.75

    Cairo-Aviv

    Cairo, Tel Aviv

    20

    $ 472.00

    $ 23,838.38

    São Paolo

    São Paolo

    34

    $ 780.00

    $ 23,283.58

    Mexico City

    Mexico City

    25

    $ 524.00

    $ 21,387.76

    Shandong

    Jinan, Zibo, Dongying

    14

    $ 249.00

    $ 17,535.21

    Delhi-Lahore

    New Delhi, Lahore

    28

    $ 417.00

    $ 14,946.24

     

    Source article:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-28/mapping-the-mega-regions-powering-the-world-s-economy#

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

Origins of Houston Neighborhoods

Afton Oaks

According to the neighborhood’s civic club, the area sprang up from farm and ranch land owned by the Stahlman and O’Meara families in the early 1950s.

Source: Afton Oaks flier

Avalon Place

According to the neighborhood’s property owners association, Dr. William Thomas Dickey, a Virginia native, bought over 460 acres of land in west Houston in 1890. In 1936, his son, also named William, began developing the lots.

Source: Avalon Property Owners Association

Bellaire

In 1908, the president of the South End Land Company founded Bellaire after purchasing 9,449 acres of land. According to advertising fliers, the name was chosen because of the area’s gulf breezes. Still, there are some who believe it was named after Bellaire, Ohio.

Source: Texas State Historical Association

Bunker Hill Village

  • Forbes‘ named the city one of its Top Places to Live Well. Its tree-lined streets, peaceful atmosphere, and beautiful homes make it a very desirable neighborhood.
  • A residential enclave located at the heart of the Memorial area, Bunker Hill features a great location near Katy Freeway (I-10) and Sam Houston Parkway (Beltway 8).
  • Bunker Hill Village is largely residential, but its location near the Memorial City Mall and the CityCentre gives residents great access to a wide variety of restaurants and stores.
  • Like most of the Memorial Villages, Bunker Hill features elegant homes sitting atop sprawling, wooded grounds. Home options range from beautifully updated ranch-style homes to newly constructed custom-built mansions.
  • The city is zoned to the highly-regarded Spring Branch ISD, and is home to two National Blue Ribbon Schools: Frostwood Elementary and Bunker Hill Elementary.

Source: Virtual Tour: Houston’s Most Expensive Neighborhoods For 2021 (houstonproperties.com)

Camp Logan

The neighborhood contained in the local ZIP code 77007 was once the site of a World War I training camp. Following the war, the City of Houston reacquired the property and developed it for the Memorial Park project.

Source: Texas River Guides

Crestwood

Like Camp Logan, Crestwood was formed after the City of Houston acquired the former stomping grounds for World War I-era soldiers.

Source: Crestwood/Glen Cove Neighborhoods

Hedwig Village

In the early 1900s, a German immigrant by the name of Hedwig Jankowski Schroeder moved into the Houston area and started a farm. Years later, his property was incorporated by the city and later developed into the City of Hedwig Village.

Source: We Relate

Houston Heights

In 1886, a Houstonian had the vision of a planned community that would be set apart from the mucky and increasingly industrialized city. The new community would be built on environmentally-rich land that was also a good 23 feet above downtown Houston.

Source: Houston Heights Association

Hunter’s Creek Village

Prior to the incorporation of Hunters Creek Village, German farmers settled the area and opened sawmills. By 1936 the community had a sawmill and several residences. In the mid-1950s, effort to form a Spring Branch municipality failed. The city incorporated in 1954 with a mayor-alderman government.

Source: Hunters Creek Village, Texas – Wikipedia

  • Hunters Creek is one of the most expensive suburbs in Texas. It is one of the independent cities that make up the Memorial Villages.
  • Here, homes for sale in Houston TX are constantly in great demand due to the area’s excellent location, superb schools, and beautiful luxury homes.
  • Originally a farming community, the city has taken great care to maintain its wooded surroundings and preserve its tranquil charm.
  • Nestled south of Katy Freeway, the city is minutes away from Loop 610 and Memorial Park. The Galleria is a short drive away, along with other key Houston districts like Downtown and the Medical Center.
  • The city is zoned to both the Spring Branch ISD and the Houston ISD. Award-winning schools like Hunters Creek Elementary School and Memorial High School serve the neighborhood.
  • The average lot area of Hunters Creek Houston homes for sale is half acre, or 21,780 square feet. Long driveways, sprawling lawns and backyards are common in the area, giving additional privacy to homeowners.

Source: Virtual Tour: Houston’s Most Expensive Neighborhoods For 2021 (houstonproperties.com)

Hyde Park

According to the neighborhood’s civic club, the area was owned by Mirabeau Lamar, the second president of the Republic of Texas. Hyde Park was developed in 1893.

Source: Hyde Park Civic Club

Memorial area of Houston (close-in)

Source: Memorial, Houston – Wikipedia

  • Located west of Downtown Houston, the Memorial area lies just outside Loop 610.
  • The vast Memorial area is made up of several rich neighborhoods in Houston, independent cities, and smaller gated communities.
  • The area is zoned to some of the top-ranked schools in Texas, including Memorial Drive Elementary, Frostwood Elementary, Wilchester Elementary, Bunker Hill Elementary, Memorial Middle and Memorial High.
  • Land value in Memorial is typically lower than neighborhoods like TanglewoodWest University, or River Oaks, and many Memorial homes for sale have large, wooded lots. A large number of Memorial homebuyers choose the area because they want more land than inner loop neighborhoods provide.
  • Memorial homes enjoy easy access to schools, stores, restaurants, entertainment centers, and parks. The Galleria/Uptown area and the Energy Corridor, two of Houston’s largest employment centers, are easily accessible from Memorial.
  • Note: The following communities have been included in the Memorial Close In area: Sherwood Forest, Winston Wood, Pinewood Estates, Bayou Woods, Stablewood, Longwoods, Oak Hill, Park Laureate Place, Park at Saddlebrook.

Source: Virtual Tour: Houston’s Most Expensive Neighborhoods For 2021 (houstonproperties.com)

Memorial Villages

In the 1950s, a number of Houston residents banded together in fear of being annexed by the City of Houston, forming several “villages”, including Memorial Villages.

Source: Martha Turner

Montrose

The area we now call (or eyeball) as the Montrose area was developed in the early 1900s on land that was being used for dairy production. The chief developer J.W. Link’s home still exists and is owned by the University of St. Thomas.

Source: New York Times

Oak Estates

In the 1940s, developer S.N. Adams took a portion of land in west Houston and built it up to look similar to the prestigious River Oaks area.

Source: 
Houston Properties

Piney Point

This community started in the 1885 as a railroad station near several sawmills in southwestern Harris County.

Source: Texas State Historical Association

  • One of the independent cities that make up the Memorial Villages, Piney Point Village is the wealthiest area in Texas by per capita income.
  • Opulence and luxury are staples in Piney Point real estate, a community where you can also find the most expensive houses in Houston. The city also enjoys a relatively central location near key Houston hubs like Galleria and Memorial Park.
  • Homes in Piney Point Village Houston typically sit on large, sprawling lots. Sizes range from half-acre (21,780 square feet) to more than 160,000 square feet.
  • Piney Point real estate, which is one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in Houston, is known for luxurious amenities. Housing options range from elegant estates to gorgeous, updated ranch-style homes, and from custom-built homes to grand manors.
  • The city is zoned to both the Spring Branch ISD and the Houston ISD. Top schools like Memorial High School and Memorial Drive Elementary serve Piney Point homes. The Kinkaid School, a prestigious prep school, is located within the city’s borders.

Source: Virtual Tour: Houston’s Most Expensive Neighborhoods For 2021 (houstonproperties.com)

Rice Military

The area’s name is derived from two sources: The wealthy Rice family and the nearby Camp Logan, a former training facility for soldiers during World War I.

Source: Houston Properties

River Oaks

In the 1920s, William Hogg and attorney Hugh Potter purchased 200 acres surrounding the River Oaks Country Club. That area would later develop into the 1,100-plus acre suburb Houstonians see today.

Source: Texas State History Association

  • River Oaks Houston is one of the most exclusive neighborhoods in Texas. This year (2021), it gained the prestige of being the most expensive neighborhood in Houston.
  • The grand dame of Houston’s luxury enclaves, River Oaks is a 1,100-acre enclave of mansions and estates found at the heart of Inner Loop Houston.
  • As one of the acclaimed upscale neighborhoods in Houston, it is north of the Upper Kirby District and is near many major thoroughfares such as Westheimer Road, Kirby Drive, and San Felipe Street.
  • Houston main districts Downtown, Galleria, and Medical Center are within 15 to 20 minutes from River Oaks.
  • Parts of River Oaks have acre-plus lots and deed restrictions to keep out commercial establishments. Other parts of River Oaks (notably on the South and Eastern sides) border the River Oaks Shopping Center and Upper Kirby/Greenway Plaza, which are home to a fabulous collection of shops and restaurants.
  • The entirety of River Oaks is a scenic view of towering trees that line streets coupled with intricately detailed bushes that lead to pocket gardens. There are also plenty of restaurants, bars, boutiques, and art galleries in the River Oaks Shopping Center and West Ave complexes. If you are looking for mansions, this is the place to be.

Source: Virtual Tour: Houston’s Most Expensive Neighborhoods For 2021 (houstonproperties.com)

Sharpstown

While he was probably more notable for his part in a huge Texas political scandal that cost many their jobs, Frank W. Sharp should be known for the subdivision he built. Around 1955, the Texas businessman developed around 4,000 acres of land just southwest of Houston. In addition, he donated a sizable portion of land to the state government for the construction of the Southwest Freeway.

Source: New York Times

Tanglewood

The area, that would later be home to then US President George H.W. Bush, was developed in the 1930s. Reportedly, the neighborhood’s name came from the “Tanglewood Tales” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, an American writer also known for the “Scarlet Letter.”

Source: Houston Chronicle

Upper Kirby

The River Oaks Garden Club Forum of Civics was constructed within this commercial district in 1910. The district takes its name after Kirby Road which was named after influential Texas businessman John Henry Kirby.

Source: R. Clayton McKee/Freelance

West University Place

In 1910, the then governor of Tennessee developed a number of country homes in the area with the first lots being sold seven years later. The area was named for its proximity to the Rice Institute.

Source: Texas State Historical Association

Thanks for viewing!

Standard
Tricks and Traditional Whiz-dim

USA COVID-19 Today

November 8, 2021

US has reported 46,405,253 cases of COVID-19.

775,723 have died of it.

331,449,281 was US population per 2020 Census. 332,001,400 was what it would have been without COVID-19.

917 in US died of COVID-19 on Census Day 2020.

193,832,584 have fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the United States of America.

 

    
 

 

 

 

 

 

COVID-19 Thus Far:

14 percent of the US population has now contracted COVID-19. 0.234 percent of the US population has died of it, so far. 13.766 percent of the US population has recovered from it so far.

The US fully vaccinated 59 percent of its population against it so far, and another 9 percent are in the process of receiving their second dose.

32 percent have yet to begin to seek protection.

 

So…

 

 

 

 

 

How about you?

 

 

How are you doing?

     
 

Data sources: United States CDC, CNN

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Standard